Just read it at the tagging ML and cannot help but have to share it with you: Tag:natural=cloud
Hopefully some interested people will comment and vote on it – and the uninterested will use it for mapping.
Just read it at the tagging ML and cannot help but have to share it with you: Tag:natural=cloud
Hopefully some interested people will comment and vote on it – and the uninterested will use it for mapping.
討論
由 DaCor 於 2014年04月 1日 22時33分 發表的評論
Nice work
Added my comments to the discussion
由 z-dude 於 2014年04月 2日 04時42分 發表的評論
I disagree with the idea of tagging clouds.
People have already tagged the limits of the hires imagery in the past, but in some cases, the imagery has been updated, but the relations have not been updated.
To a casual mapper, updating relations can be a confusing task, especially on odd shapes or relations with many parts.
An example - high res imagery boundary in Mali osm.org/relation/2770026#map=6/19.280/0.780
I’d rather see ‘fixme’ tags on roads which have been interpolated under cloudy imagery.
由 Pieren 於 2014年04月 3日 10時05分 發表的評論
For history, just remember that the wiki page has been create a 1st april -> April Fool’s joke
由 RoadLessTravelled 於 2014年04月 5日 16時21分 發表的評論
Yes, I’m forever wishing I could have my GPS tell me to turn right at the next cumulo nimbus…