OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
44611803 over 8 years ago

Hi Luciola,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits to the map are greatly appreciated. But you have left some of the footways here unconnected and there definitely seems to be a road connecting these footways to the nearby residential road. It would be great if you can connect these footways.

Happy mapping!

Best,

Manohar

44611818 over 8 years ago

Hi minar,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. I observed some duplicate nodes, overlapping footways in your edits. It would be great if you can fix these.

Best,

Manohar

44611970 over 8 years ago

Related changeset comment osm.org/changeset/20684450#map=15/34.9375/-81.0297

But first welcome to OpenStreetMap. It would be great if a local mapper can update the polygon here.

Best,

Manohar

20684450 over 8 years ago

Hi Lightning,

Observed that you originally created this amenity=university circular polygon here osm.org/way/256490835/history. May I know why this was mapped circular. There was an edit to the amenity recently in this changeset from a new user osm.org/changeset/44611970. This shape of the polygon seems unrealistic from satellite imagery. Can you update the geometry?

Best,

Manohar

40651812 over 8 years ago

@SomeoneElse left a personal message to the mapper to encourage participation in this changeset discussion(https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251#issuecomment-268164570). Have not received a reply yet. What do you suggest on next actions?

44453803 over 8 years ago

Hi tlt83,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you have deleted this track that clearly seemed to exist in the imagery. But the track seems to exist in bing, mapbox satellite and USGS imagery. It would be great if you can trace back the track into the map.

Best,

Manohar

44528697 over 8 years ago

Hi ajnunley,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that this trail you tried to map here does not have any feature tags and there are other unconnected nodes here as well. Would be great if you can fix it and trace the trail again.

Best,

Manohar

43977595 over 8 years ago

Hi Ryan Holliday,

Should this wikidata tag be added to this way instead then osm.org/way/2762458?

Best,

Manohar

44324933 over 8 years ago

Hi maurice2010,

Few of the buildings and parking lots you have deleted in this changeset do exist in the satellite imagery. But the imagery is from 2013 and so old. Are you sure they have been all demolished?

Best,

Manohar

44184590 over 8 years ago

Hi margonotmango,

I see that you are using JOSM. You can goto `Data` in top menu, -> Select `Revert Changeset`. You should give each changeset ID and revert. Remember that you cannot do randomly. You must revert in the order of latest to last. Please follow this guide. Once you revert all the changesets, you must upload the changes to OSM. Read osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

Best,
Manohar

44184590 over 8 years ago

Hi margonotmango,

This seems like a private project and the changes to the data on OSM seems to be undiscussed. Could you please revert all your changesets that have lanelet mapping. Let me know if you need help in reversion.

Best,
Manohar

44184590 over 8 years ago

Hi margonotmango,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed you have been creating, tagging a number of ways at intersections with relation `type=lanelet` giving roles to ways `left` and `right`. This seems odd. I couldn't find information regarding this tagging scheme in the wiki. Can you explain the reasoning behind this and discussed source of this type of tagging scheme.

Best,

Manohar

44172677 over 8 years ago

Hi Akram Dandal,

Welcome to OpenstreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated.

But this alpine hut you have mapped seems to have been mapped on a residential area according to satellite imagery. It would be great if you can correct this.

Best,

Manohar

40651812 over 8 years ago

@SomeoneElse Thanks for your comment. Apologies for my late reply. I opened a ticket in Mapbox mapping repository to track cleanup of the user edits (https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251) and put together a gist noting down my observations (https://gist.github.com/manoharuss/3491a33c1b163dc201a5962c26747fb3) for your reference. Would be great if you can take a look.

Best,

Manohar

41880150 over 8 years ago

@SomeoneElse Received a reply from a Sri Lankan community member https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-263036509

41880150 over 8 years ago

@SomeoneElse, OpenStreetMap Sri Lanka group on Facebook seemed more active. Left a quick post to get traction. Hopefully, someone replies. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-262752019

43891058 over 8 years ago

Hi Alexandr Apasov,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. The name tag was supposed to be the name of the business or the cafeteria in this case and not the description. It would be great if you can correct your edit.

Thanks,
Manohar

43837200 over 8 years ago

Hi jun hyuck kim,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have been giving korean names in name:en tag. name:en tag is for english. Please correct your edits. Korean names can be given in name:ko tag. Feel free to reply.

Best,
Manohar

43392394 over 8 years ago

Hi Benjidevedas,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But you have deleted place=neighborhood tags here. If these are wrong, you can correct them. Please undo these deletions if this is an accidental deletion. Feel free to reply.

Best,
Manohar

42139116 over 8 years ago

Hi Donavan Paul,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is appreciated. But I have observed that you have only outdoor shops with alphanumeric names. We must only map what is there on the ground with their names. Your edits do not seem reasonable. OSM is a public database. If these are your personal bookmarks, they are visible to everybody. It would be great if you can read osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and cleanup your edits. Feel free to reply.

Best,
Manohar