Hi Glass Cup,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. This way you added here is crossing with itself in several places, crossing with a building. osm.org/way/463978015

It would be if you can correct these and in general also keep the ways into smaller segments which would be easier for corrections.

Best,

Manohar

Hi Bored,

Looking at https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#44989682

All of these ways you have deleted seemed to exist in the imagery with appropriate feature tags. If they are well mapped, exist on the ground (be it for private use which is also tagged) how are they unnecessary?

Best,

Manohar

Hi user983427120,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. But the buildings, parking area you have deleted here do indeed exist according to Bing imagery. It would be great if you can remap them back. Thank you.

Best,

Manohar

Hi esunget,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. But I have found issues in this changeset I would like to share. osm.org/way/466843872 this way has footway=crossing, crossing=zebra for the whole way. These tags are ideal for only the section of the way mapped over the zebra crossing. Read osm.wiki/Key:crossing. Let me know if you have any questions. Please correct your edits wherever necessary. Thank you.

Best,

Manohar

Hi Andrey Steklo,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But you have given the whole address in the addr:street tag which I corrected here osm.org/node/4614154594.

best,

Manohar

Hi Andrew Matheny,

Some of the imported buildings have overlaps with some highways in this changeset. The highways themselves are misaligned and not the buildings imported. It would be great if you can align these.

Best,

Manohar

Hi Arthurian Arthur,

Your contributions to OpenStreetMap are greatly appreciated. But I see some issues with the mapping here. You have added so many trunk roads here(osm.org/way/465184630#map=19/-18.38813/21.84731), which do not seem like trunk roads at all. There were previously mapped highways on which your edits are overlapping. There are buildings as well which are overlapping(osm.org/way/465184628). It would be if you can correct your edits. Feel free to reply.

Best,

Manohar

Hi Herison Teixeira,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in mapping is greatly appreciated. But Google is a proprietary database from which one cannot copy map into OpenStreetMap. Can you confirm that this is not the case here?

Best,

Manohar

Hi Visit MS Gulf Coast,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. As user_5359 specified in the above comment, waterbody in the sea with a sound tag does not seem plausible. I have deleted this feature object. osm.wiki/Map_Features this woud be good reading to understand the kind of features that could be mapped. It is always a safe bet to read the wiki for the tag you wish to use for acceptable key values as well. Happy mapping.

Best,

Manohar

@SomeoneElse from Satellite imagery, this seems like a residential area. Seems betting and bookmaking is a legal, regulated business in Sri Lanka. There is no way to verify this mapped object by the user. From the given name tag, this could also be a personal bookmark.

@SomeoneElse Thanks for cleaning this up

Hi SuffolkNY,

You seemed to have added 17000 orphaned nodes here. May I know how this happened.

best,

Manohar

Hi Cynthi Cepada,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. The footway you added was crossing the service road here. I have fixed this. Please make sure that the highways you add do not cross with the existing map data.

Best,

Manohar

Hi GoogleMapMaker,

Refer wiki for bus stop names osm.wiki/Buses. Are these the actual names of the bus stops?

Best,

Manohar

Hi Jacob T,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you have been mapping addresses of buildings. This is great. But you don't have to give the address again in the name tag. Name tag is for names of businesses, houses etc. Refer osm.wiki/Key:name

Best,

Manohar

Hi Kevin Boggs,

First, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in mapping is appreciated. OSM is an open public collaborative aiming at making the most up to date and detailed map.

I have read the discussion in your other changeset. Thanks for mapping and further thanks for correcting your edits. But I have found the newer footway you have added to be unconnected to any nearby roads. I suggest you connect the way to the other highways and also add `access=permissive` as you do not want absolute strangers to pass through.

Please feel free to reply and I encourage to continue mapping.

Best,

Manohar

@SomeoneElse No update from SL community :( this was the last update https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-263036509

Hi Dillon Schneider,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in mapping is greatly appreciated. But I have found that this footway you added cross intersecting and unconnected. I have undone your change. It would be great if you can map this correctly and also reminder that private ways used inside personal properties are to be tagged with `access=private` to avoid strangers wandering into your private property using OSM. Read osm.wiki/Map_Features and osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions.

Best,

Manohar

Hi jrayt,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in mapping your is appreciated. I have found your edits overlapping, adding non existing footways. I have undone your changes. I would like to request to keep the mapping realistic and map only what exists on the ground. Please take a look at osm.wiki/Map_Features and osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Best,

Manohar

Hi Alexander Court,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are appreciated. But I have undone your changeset because you have changed road classification of paths to footways. Ex osm.org/way/51220096 this way is a well mapped way with highway=path tag. For a trail path is correct. May I know why you changed all these ways to footway?

This is my revert changeset osm.org/changeset/44612804

Best,

Manohar