manoharuss's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
44611803 | over 8 years ago | Hi Luciola, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits to the map are greatly appreciated. But you have left some of the footways here unconnected and there definitely seems to be a road connecting these footways to the nearby residential road. It would be great if you can connect these footways. Happy mapping! Best, Manohar |
44611818 | over 8 years ago | Hi minar, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. I observed some duplicate nodes, overlapping footways in your edits. It would be great if you can fix these. Best, Manohar |
44611970 | over 8 years ago | Related changeset comment osm.org/changeset/20684450#map=15/34.9375/-81.0297 But first welcome to OpenStreetMap. It would be great if a local mapper can update the polygon here. Best, Manohar |
20684450 | over 8 years ago | Hi Lightning, Observed that you originally created this amenity=university circular polygon here osm.org/way/256490835/history. May I know why this was mapped circular. There was an edit to the amenity recently in this changeset from a new user osm.org/changeset/44611970. This shape of the polygon seems unrealistic from satellite imagery. Can you update the geometry? Best, Manohar |
40651812 | over 8 years ago | @SomeoneElse left a personal message to the mapper to encourage participation in this changeset discussion(https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251#issuecomment-268164570). Have not received a reply yet. What do you suggest on next actions? |
44453803 | over 8 years ago | Hi tlt83, Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. I have observed that you have deleted this track that clearly seemed to exist in the imagery. But the track seems to exist in bing, mapbox satellite and USGS imagery. It would be great if you can trace back the track into the map. Best, Manohar |
44528697 | over 8 years ago | Hi ajnunley, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that this trail you tried to map here does not have any feature tags and there are other unconnected nodes here as well. Would be great if you can fix it and trace the trail again. Best, Manohar |
43977595 | over 8 years ago | Hi Ryan Holliday, Should this wikidata tag be added to this way instead then osm.org/way/2762458? Best, Manohar |
44324933 | over 8 years ago | Hi maurice2010, Few of the buildings and parking lots you have deleted in this changeset do exist in the satellite imagery. But the imagery is from 2013 and so old. Are you sure they have been all demolished? Best, Manohar |
44184590 | over 8 years ago | Hi margonotmango, I see that you are using JOSM. You can goto `Data` in top menu, -> Select `Revert Changeset`. You should give each changeset ID and revert. Remember that you cannot do randomly. You must revert in the order of latest to last. Please follow this guide. Once you revert all the changesets, you must upload the changes to OSM. Read osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter Best,
|
44184590 | over 8 years ago | Hi margonotmango, This seems like a private project and the changes to the data on OSM seems to be undiscussed. Could you please revert all your changesets that have lanelet mapping. Let me know if you need help in reversion. Best,
|
44184590 | over 8 years ago | Hi margonotmango, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed you have been creating, tagging a number of ways at intersections with relation `type=lanelet` giving roles to ways `left` and `right`. This seems odd. I couldn't find information regarding this tagging scheme in the wiki. Can you explain the reasoning behind this and discussed source of this type of tagging scheme. Best, Manohar |
44172677 | over 8 years ago | Hi Akram Dandal, Welcome to OpenstreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But this alpine hut you have mapped seems to have been mapped on a residential area according to satellite imagery. It would be great if you can correct this. Best, Manohar |
40651812 | over 8 years ago | @SomeoneElse Thanks for your comment. Apologies for my late reply. I opened a ticket in Mapbox mapping repository to track cleanup of the user edits (https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251) and put together a gist noting down my observations (https://gist.github.com/manoharuss/3491a33c1b163dc201a5962c26747fb3) for your reference. Would be great if you can take a look. Best, Manohar |
41880150 | over 8 years ago | @SomeoneElse Received a reply from a Sri Lankan community member https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-263036509 |
41880150 | over 8 years ago | @SomeoneElse, OpenStreetMap Sri Lanka group on Facebook seemed more active. Left a quick post to get traction. Hopefully, someone replies. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-262752019 |
43891058 | over 8 years ago | Hi Alexandr Apasov, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. The name tag was supposed to be the name of the business or the cafeteria in this case and not the description. It would be great if you can correct your edit. Thanks,
|
43837200 | over 8 years ago | Hi jun hyuck kim, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have been giving korean names in name:en tag. name:en tag is for english. Please correct your edits. Korean names can be given in name:ko tag. Feel free to reply. Best,
|
43392394 | over 8 years ago | Hi Benjidevedas, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But you have deleted place=neighborhood tags here. If these are wrong, you can correct them. Please undo these deletions if this is an accidental deletion. Feel free to reply. Best,
|
42139116 | over 8 years ago | Hi Donavan Paul, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is appreciated. But I have observed that you have only outdoor shops with alphanumeric names. We must only map what is there on the ground with their names. Your edits do not seem reasonable. OSM is a public database. If these are your personal bookmarks, they are visible to everybody. It would be great if you can read osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and cleanup your edits. Feel free to reply. Best,
|