OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
46881320 over 8 years ago

Hi Toni Serra,

Is the name correct for this feature?
osm.org/way/114551775
Seemed like a description and wanted to clarify.

Thanks,

Manohar

46733613 over 8 years ago

Hi laurenmalia,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. Observed that you have given 'Long distance bus station' as name for this way
osm.org/node/4727389489. It seemed like a description and wanted to clarify. Is this the actual name of the bus station?

Best,

Manohar

46710457 over 8 years ago

Hi AndiWin,

Curious why this changeset is not associated with any OSM editor and why this changeset was open for exactly 1hr.

Thanks,

Manohar

46700931 over 8 years ago

Hi lorandr_telenav,

Observed that this changeset bbox is huge. May I suggest keeping the changeset size to a smaller area by uploading often.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

46553874 over 8 years ago

Hi mustafakamil,

I have observed that you have been editing "Jebel Aulia Reservoir". Even though you have spending a lot of time working on this waterbody relation, observe that this is not rendering on OSM.

See: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8921295/23598039/ae8e4f26-025d-11e7-87e2-0935ca4ef959.png

This is because of errors in how you have been formulating this relation. Outer way can be the general boundary of the feature. This outer does not have to be 2 separate polygons touching each other. This can be one boundary for the whole body. Also polygons inside a relation do not need to be connected to each other in any way as these are anyway under a relation.

Let me know if you need any help correcting this relation. Your work is not rendering here and this relation would need further work.

Best,

Manohar

46530049 over 8 years ago

Hi jcaviborg,

You have deleted a lot of farms and landuse polygons here. May I know why?

http://osmcha.mapbox.com/46530049/

Best,

Manohar

46496106 over 8 years ago

Hi palmfiction,

Welcome to OpenStreeetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But you did 2 tabletennis points here. I have deleted one point.

Thanks,

Manohar

46496307 over 8 years ago

Hi Cherrytours,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have added 'building=Lux Berlin' as values to these buildings. This is a wrong tag value. You can add a commercial building by using 'building=commercial' or an office by 'building=office'.

Reading: osm.wiki/Buildings

I have fixed these building tags. Please take a look at the building mapping documentation for OSM.

Best,

Manohar

46460863 over 8 years ago

You have changed Lake Victoria into a forest. And changed an island boundary=administrative to a forest. Do not vandalise the map. Any further edits to vandalise the map will be reported to the OpenStreetMap Data working group(DWG).

Manohar

46480461 over 8 years ago

hi Michael Klemp,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But I have found that you have given a description on access in the name tag. This is already covered in "access=no" tag. You don't need to specifically mention that it is only for residents.

please see osm.wiki/Key:access on mapping access restriction.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

46414460 over 8 years ago

Have not observed it. My bad. Thanks for clarifying Michael.

Best.

Manohar

46414460 over 8 years ago

Hi WernerMap,

This fire hydrant is right in the middle of the road. Is this position right?

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

46385800 over 8 years ago

Hi Foothills,

I read the discussion on your first changeset. And as it seems you have imported similar incompatible road set again into OSM. 1. Before importing any data into OSM, read up on what is procedure regarding imports, what data is acceptable on OSM. Read: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines 2. None of these tags that the features have any tags associated with OSM. "highway=collector" is not a valid tag. Reading: osm.wiki/Key:highway 3. A import is best done by merging with existing data. For example if you have better geometry, you can replace geometry of the existing data and keep the feature tags but not introduce duplicates.

I am raising this issue with Data Working Group.

Until your edits are cleanedup or merged please do not continue importing.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

46330618 over 8 years ago

hi Arungkaran,

These ponds do not exist according to the imagery. Are you sure these are water bodies.

Thanks.

Manohar

46329189 over 8 years ago

Can you correct road classification around this area osm.org/way/171433264/history is also not tertiary_link. Link roads are the small connecting exit roads.

46329189 over 8 years ago

Please tag these as unclassified

46329189 over 8 years ago

Hi Vijayotp,

I see that you have been mapping all along this coastline and mapping only tertiary roads. These are not tertiary roads. Please read osm.wiki/India:Tags/Highway

It would be great if you can correct this. Thank you.

Manohar

46320998 over 8 years ago

Hi secretlondon,

Shape of these buildings do not match satellite imagery. Getting the intrusions and extrusions of a complicated building is tedious. But the way you drew renders bad on the map. Check out these iD editor shortcuts osm.wiki/ID/Shortcuts to square out the buildings.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar

46293136 over 8 years ago

Hi 25or6to4,
May I suggest smaller bbox approach in uploading edits.

Thanks,

Manohar

46249185 over 8 years ago

Hi jryanart,

Welcome to OSM. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. Greate that you are contributing to HOT mapping tasks. But I have observed that you have delete the geometry of this road and made it a straight line. Verifying from satellite imagery this does not seem right. I have reverted your edit. If this is accidental, never mind. Please check before uploading your changes.

Best,

Manohar