Hi EmGee0430,

Nice job on building mapping here. If you can correct the overlapping buildings here that would be great.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi DaveHath,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Nice job here on building mapping. If you can fix the building overlapping issues here, that would be great.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi AragonChristopherR17Z,

I understand a large relation is manageable by splitting it into smaller relations. But the bay area relation here seems broken. May I suggest using JOSM for easier manipulation of relations. I understand that you have created these relations in the first place and maintain the relation. But the ways in the relation currently do not roles, the outers are not closed. I can definitely help you sort this bay area into a nice single relation that can be easier to be maintained over time. Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Manohar

This relation is now broken osm.org/relation/6579950

Hi Grand Homes,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I have observed that these ways you created here do not exist in the imagery and look very roughly mapped. I reverted your edits. But please talk a look at osm.wiki/Beginners'_guide

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi Hollywood Theater Burleson TX,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is greatly appreciated. But you deleted valid data here. If you are a local mapper, it would be greatly appreciated if you can improve your neighborhood. I am reverting your changeset as it deleted a lot of valid data.
This trunk road is one example osm.org/way/438458178/history

Best,

Manohar

Thank you. Cleared up.

Best,

Manohar

Hi ListenOrange,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is greatly appreciated. OSM aims to be a live map of the real world. Understand that your edits are useful for the wider audience and carry a great reach. If you were a user of OSM and relied on OSM for your daily map usages, knowing that a station you regularly travel by is deleted because of clutter does not seem reasonable. There are a lot of other ways you can contribute to the map. Ex: Adding roads and buildings in your neighborhood. Further you can micromap certain things like adding height information for buildings. There are a lot of exciting things and possibilities. But I would not suggest deleting already mapped features for aesthetic or personal purposes.

Thanks.

Manohar

Hi wolfbert,

Observed that this changeset was open for more than 2hrs and the changeset seems to have touched a large area. Just leaving a note here to confirm if this was an intended behaviour.

Thanks,

Manohar

Hi carmenhotel,

You do not need to add + instead space between words in name tag. I have observed that you have been adding POIs with similar plus signs in name tags. Can you correct these? From the metadata, it appears that the changeset is created_by carmenhotel@milestoneinternet.com. Can you give more information? Is this POI information coming from carmenhotel database?

Thanks!

Manohar

You just added building=yes tag to osm.org/relation/544731

hi timwenzel98,

Is this import of elevation tags discussed and documented somewhere?

Thanks,

Manohar

This changeset as well.

hi Manuchehr,

You just created 10001 untagged nodes here. Is this a broken import? Can you revert and cleanup?

Thanks,

Manohar

@mjkab108 I am not. I apologize for assuming this was a wrong edit and removing the name. But from your initial mapping of park on a residential area made me think this was not a right addition to the map osm.org/changeset/46968599

Otherwise great mapping activity by the way. So awesome. Happy mapping.

Hi mjkab108,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to OSM are greatly appreciated. But this place does not look like a park from satellite imagery. Please make sure that you map what is existing on the ground. Deleting these.

Best,

Manohar

Hi katpatuka,

https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8921295/24032217/d9d63920-0b0c-11e7-9d21-4c2cb2fe924f.png

want to clarify if this is indeed correct here.

Thanks,
Manohar

Hi Blackruby,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have given place=city tag to offices. These 3 osm.org/node/4733251810/history, osm.org/node/4733251766/history, osm.org/node/4733252540/history. You probably want to use osm.wiki/Tag:building%3Doffice and osm.wiki/Tag:office%3Dgovernment.

Can you correct your edits?

Best,

Manohar

Hi Cz ja,

You did change relation osm.org/relation/3231891 from a forest to redbead wetland. Are you sure this is right? From Bing imagery I see distinction between the area tagged as forest and wetland here.

Thanks,
Manohar