Non necessario, l'ho fatto io. Grazie per il suggerimento.

Nun, das Stück war schon vor mir, also bevor ich die E-Route und die Flixbus-Route umgeswitcht habe, schon als fertige Straße getaggt gewesen.

Ich weiß jetzt nicht, wer das gemacht hat, aber das kann man ja nachsehen.

Auf jeden Fall sah das für mich aus, als ob die Straße schon vorzeitig fertig wurde, was ja manchmal passiert.

Anscheinend ist das nicht so, schade.

Hi VinasCZ,

Thank you for your improving. I didn't know that this source: http://www.ceskedalnice.cz/dalnice/d4/ are not current. That is a little bit tricky. I'll have to be more careful in the future. Thanks again.

Marco

Servus PT-53,

Ich habe hier nur ein unsauberes Tagging verbessert, da der Kreisel schon als fertiggestellt eingetragen war. Dieses "construction=primary" mit der Kombination "highway=primary" wird als fertig gerendert und wird bei JOSM auch als Fehlerquelle beanstandet.

Aber es gibt Quellen die sagen, dass der Kreisel fertig sei. Hier diese Fehlermeldung osm.org/note/2210609 und dieser Link: https://rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/rpf/Abt4/Strassenbau/a5-Muellheim-Neuenburg/Seiten/default.aspx. Wenn man die Graphik am Ende des Links vergleicht mit der Aussage der Fehlermeldung, so scheint der Kreisel schon fertiggestellt worden zu sein. Und hier ist sogar die Bestätigung dafür: https://www.badische-zeitung.de/der-neue-kreisverkehr-an-der-anschlussstelle-neuenburg-ist-offen--185628643.html.

Viele Grüße
Marco

Ich denke ja, da an der Strecke immer noch gearbeitet wird. Ich weiß aber nicht, ob die Freisinger Straße wieder hergestellt wird. Vielleicht weiß User Florian Voit mehr, siehe Link unter source weiter oben.

Hallo,

das Datum ist korrigiert, siehe https://rp-online.de/app/staumelder/b321/.

Scheint etwas Längeres zu sein. Angeblich soll auf dieser Stecke, oder in der Nähe davon, eine sog. Moorbrücke gebaut werden. Weißt Du da was Näheres dazu?

Hier dazu der Link: https://www.myheimat.de/de--schwerin--74/kultur/hat-schwerin-auch-bald-ein-baustellen-desaster-d3118856.html

Hello sanchi,

I must revert my last posting, because of these sides: osm.wiki/Key:exit_to and osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction.

In the paragraph "Destination of the exit" calls, that " The alternative key exit_to=* directly on the node motorway_junction node is not recommended any more. It has the disadvantage that it might be ambiguous in some cases, e.g. on parallel motorways (though using exit_to:right and exit_to:left solves this, which is also a problem for ref=* on the node), that it doesn't work for non-motorway junctions with more than two destinations, and that it does not allow to break down destinations per lane."

OK, that is a reasoned answer for this. It sounds logical for me.

What do you think about?

Best regards

Marco

Hello sanchi,

Thank you for your link.

JOSM says for some weeks this tagging with "exit_to" has to be old-fashioned and should be changed to "destination".

Obviously there is a new tagging policy to introduce. If it will so, than is this linking side and in the way other sides not up to date. That means, we have a lot of work to do.

Who programs this bullshit for JOSM, now? Thank you for letting me know.

Best regards
Marco

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab's gleich selber ausgebessert. Müsste jetzt wieder alles OK sein.

Hallo shoegazer,

Danke für die Info. Das ist anscheinend doch was Längeres. Ich hab noch ein opening_day hinzugefügt und den Link als source dazu, damit man weiß, wann wri wieder umtaggen können. Ich denke, dass wird dann reichen.

Viele Grüße
Marco

Viele Grüße

Servus shoegazer,

Weißt Du, wie lange die Baustelle dort in Gera läuft? Gibt's da was Konkretes dazu?

Viele Grüße

Marco

Hi jupe,
Do you know about the link near Dragoman (bg. = Драгоман)? Have you got some information, now? Or does here exist a gap, at the moment? Thanks a lot.

OK, It's Mardi Gras. ;-)

Pardon???

Hello Mac,

There are really interesting examples that you have given. That could be the key to solve this problem. I am cautiously optimistic that it could work. Just take a look.

Regards,
Marco

Hi Mac,
I know what you mean. This error exists also for ferries ect.

I have tried to solve this problem, too, with less success. I have tagged a bus=yes on this tunnel-line. The error was gone, but the whole community was not amused about this. So I must have deleted this tag. Since than I have ignored this error.

Perhaps an IT-Specialist has a solution for this problem. Not really satisfied is the whole thing.

Best regards

Marco

Hello, MacLondon,
What is your intention, to split this Flixbus-Line? Can you explain that, please? I think that is not a good idea, because it is a whole line, which use the Eurotunnel train.

Best regards

Marco

Hello EneaSuper,
Do you know when the Via Aurelia will be open, now? Or is it a longer term construction?

Best regards

Marco

Good question. I don't know why the reverter just do it like this. It is a program mistake or anything else in this way? I'm really overasked. I have deleted, now.

Hello gabro00,

I have also seen, that other relations had been deleted. Last night, I have tried to do a revert. It has failed because of a deleted way, yet.

And now, I have tried to start a revert a second time. In this atempt I was more successful, than before. But it was a little bit complicated to solve it. I hope, I have everyone deleted transport relations. Can you check, if all relations already there, please?

I have also found, which changesset has caused this mistake. It was changeset No. 7871850 from user HeidrichA. Obviously he has got a problem with JOSM. We must ask him.

So far so good.

Best regards

Marco