Sorry, what is mentioned on this link is theoretical, the SADR is only a group of mercenaries supported militarily and financially by Algeria and who sequester a defenseless population, this part is a buffer zone monitored by MINURSO and Morocco does not let anyone enter it, the latest actions on the ground prove it.
Let me get this straight: You’re saying that they do not have on-the-ground control of the area they’ve been given on the map? Just be succinct about it, no need to use buzzwords
If you think that the current mapping is incorrect or the situation have changed, then please do discuss with the rest of the OSM community - at the moment, the main talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk is probably the best place to do that. Although a few people have have commented on this diary entry, not everyone will see it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.
Discussion
Comentari de Eiim lo 10 de mai 2022 a 22:23
OSM uses the “on the ground” principle, referring to who has control of the area, rather than using any one group’s borders, for disputed areas. See osm.wiki/Disputed_territories and https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf.
Comentari de melo_mo lo 10 de mai 2022 a 22:52
Sorry, what is mentioned on this link is theoretical, the SADR is only a group of mercenaries supported militarily and financially by Algeria and who sequester a defenseless population, this part is a buffer zone monitored by MINURSO and Morocco does not let anyone enter it, the latest actions on the ground prove it.
Comentari de snoozingnewt lo 11 de mai 2022 a 00:46
Let me get this straight: You’re saying that they do not have on-the-ground control of the area they’ve been given on the map? Just be succinct about it, no need to use buzzwords
Comentari de SomeoneElse lo 11 de mai 2022 a 18:36
Hello melo_mo,
The current mapping in this area is the result of a community discussion, which resulted in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 back in 2016..
If you think that the current mapping is incorrect or the situation have changed, then please do discuss with the rest of the OSM community - at the moment, the main talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk is probably the best place to do that. Although a few people have have commented on this diary entry, not everyone will see it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.