murble's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
165433740 | 3 months ago | I agree, that the memorial=plaque doesn't quite fit. This was a quick walk by addition, + mapnote, i had to quickly add some more metadata as someone was annoyed by my ``personal'' mapnote and marked it as resolved, which would cause the streetcomplete hosted photos to evaporate. Thanks for the walk suggestion, we'll consider that when we're next in the area, we did enjoy the wild garlic. Anyway I've updated it in changeset #165458304 |
86817806 | 6 months ago | oops, thanks for pointing it out, fixed, something must have sneaked into my paste buffer! |
161160209 | 7 months ago | Have you surveyed this path? |
157853155 | 10 months ago | Does it actually operate as a biergarten, e.g. separate business that sells beer, typically with table service ,outside in a garten, rather than an outdoor seating area for a bar or pub? in the uk we typically do the seperate seating area tagging, although also had amenity=beer_garden which doesn't imply the meanings biergarten have. |
138231775 | about 1 year ago | Hi just looking at this, you appear to have added the pavement on the wrong side of the road, i have also added a map note osm.org/note/4319263 you can confirm the wrongness here with streetside |
144629567 | over 1 year ago | why did you make this mass change without discussion? |
135174608 | almost 2 years ago | expressway=yes seems unlikely here. given there is cycling infrastructure etc. what is your reasoning? |
111805285 | almost 2 years ago | corrected spelling of what? |
136209916 | about 2 years ago | Hi tjwyork, thanks for doing all these building outlines & numbers etc, but can you look at the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels Overlay as your building alignment appears a little off.
|
97798821 | over 2 years ago | Have you surveyed this on the ground? |
131335170 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for doing this work! |
129734109 | over 2 years ago | Hi thanks for improving the map, but please can you check relations you may be accidentally breaking when doing edits like this? osm.org/relation/318579 is now split into several parts. see also http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=318579 thanks bill |
123675515 | over 2 years ago | oops, corrected to fire hydrant! |
121600340 | about 3 years ago | Mapping is a multi-stage process.
If you feel these edits have little worth, feel free improve them, you should be able to infer stuff like
Maybe if you're in the area you could find other detail I may have missed during my walk through. cheers
|
116946677 | over 3 years ago | There is a specific bike entrance turning from Castle Street, but oneway:bicycle=no is not related to the existence or not of cycle lanes. |
116946677 | over 3 years ago | Did you actually survey this?, You appear to have removed the oneway:bicycle=no on park row. |
90833161 | about 4 years ago | I don't think leisure=pitch was totally unreasonable in the way that recreation ground for an area where people are going to be discharging high energy projectiles clearly is.
Are you saying you blindly changed every use of leisure=pitch without looking at what you were changing sorry if i have misunderstood? |
90833161 | about 4 years ago | osm.org/way/28687269/history as an example. but you seem to have changed loads of other shooting ranges to that in this changeset. |
90833161 | about 4 years ago | a recreation ground inside a danger area relation, seems slightly inappropriate(!), oh and you missed off fee=yes ;-) |
94601232 | over 4 years ago | The owners of the property are fine with this level of detail. There are no privacy concerns. The BBQ exists and has the plaque with the inscription. I helpfully included a photo link.
|