Лого на OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Измени Кога Коментар
165433740 пред 3 месеци

I agree, that the memorial=plaque doesn't quite fit. This was a quick walk by addition, + mapnote, i had to quickly add some more metadata as someone was annoyed by my ``personal'' mapnote and marked it as resolved, which would cause the streetcomplete hosted photos to evaporate. Thanks for the walk suggestion, we'll consider that when we're next in the area, we did enjoy the wild garlic.

Anyway I've updated it in changeset #165458304

86817806 пред 6 месеци

oops, thanks for pointing it out, fixed, something must have sneaked into my paste buffer!

161160209 пред 7 месеци

Have you surveyed this path?

157853155 пред 10 месеци

Does it actually operate as a biergarten, e.g. separate business that sells beer, typically with table service ,outside in a garten, rather than an outdoor seating area for a bar or pub? in the uk we typically do the seperate seating area tagging, although also had amenity=beer_garden which doesn't imply the meanings biergarten have.

138231775 пред околу 1 година

Hi just looking at this, you appear to have added the pavement on the wrong side of the road, i have also added a map note osm.org/note/4319263 you can confirm the wrongness here with streetside

144629567 пред повеќе од 1 година

why did you make this mass change without discussion?

135174608 речиси пред 2 години

expressway=yes seems unlikely here. given there is cycling infrastructure etc. what is your reasoning?

111805285 речиси пред 2 години

corrected spelling of what?

136209916 пред околу 2 години

Hi tjwyork, thanks for doing all these building outlines & numbers etc, but can you look at the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels Overlay as your building alignment appears a little off.
thanks
bill

97798821 пред повеќе од 2 години

Have you surveyed this on the ground?

131335170 пред повеќе од 2 години

Thanks for doing this work!

129734109 пред повеќе од 2 години

Hi thanks for improving the map, but please can you check relations you may be accidentally breaking when doing edits like this? osm.org/relation/318579 is now split into several parts. see also http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=318579

thanks

bill

123675515 пред повеќе од 2 години

oops, corrected to fire hydrant!

121600340 пред околу 3 години

Mapping is a multi-stage process.
I was on the ground adding detail that could easily be added with the tools I had, in the time I had.

If you feel these edits have little worth, feel free improve them, you should be able to infer stuff like
addr:place=Siberstein etc.

Maybe if you're in the area you could find other detail I may have missed during my walk through.

cheers
bill

116946677 пред повеќе од 3 години

There is a specific bike entrance turning from Castle Street, but oneway:bicycle=no is not related to the existence or not of cycle lanes.

116946677 пред повеќе од 3 години

Did you actually survey this?, You appear to have removed the oneway:bicycle=no on park row.

90833161 пред околу 4 години

I don't think leisure=pitch was totally unreasonable in the way that recreation ground for an area where people are going to be discharging high energy projectiles clearly is.
The edit by User Hemmers doesn't seem unreasonable given it was fixing the use of military tags and pitch was already used for various other shooting areas in the uk, some of which you've changed in the same changeset!

Are you saying you blindly changed every use of leisure=pitch without looking at what you were changing sorry if i have misunderstood?

90833161 пред околу 4 години

osm.org/way/28687269/history as an example. but you seem to have changed loads of other shooting ranges to that in this changeset.

90833161 пред околу 4 години

a recreation ground inside a danger area relation, seems slightly inappropriate(!), oh and you missed off fee=yes ;-)

94601232 пред повеќе од 4 години

The owners of the property are fine with this level of detail. There are no privacy concerns.

The BBQ exists and has the plaque with the inscription. I helpfully included a photo link.
Further more it was tagged access=private!