mvexel's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
73226397 | almost 6 years ago | Since this is the back access to the properties, highway=service is more appropriate here. Changed accordingly.
|
72886788 | about 6 years ago | Hi and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution. If you plan on contributing more in the future, here's a few tips I hope you will find helpful:
|
72618414 | about 6 years ago | Hi Freedom Editor! Could you please add descriptive comments to your changesets? Especially when editing administrative relations and city nodes, it would help to know what triggered the change. Could you elaborate on this one specifically since I am local to Salt Lake City? Thanks! |
70243814 | about 6 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. It looks like you're trying to bulk-upload data into OSM using ArcGIS. The result of this upload is 2440 nodes (points) with no attributes. This is of no value to OSM. I am assuming you didn't mean to do harm and make a meaningful contribution to OSM. I am happy to help you with that, but I will revert (undo) this change. I am local (Salt Lake City) and run an OSM meetup which you are welcome to join! Please message me through OSM (click on my username and click 'Send Message' if you want to work together on this. Looking forward to talking more! |
70209639 | about 6 years ago | [a link](https://example.com) |
70209639 | about 6 years ago |  |
69327505 | about 6 years ago | I posted to talk-us, please see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2019-May/019507.html |
69327505 | about 6 years ago | I looked again at the transit route wiki and it states the recommended value as "<type of transport><reference number>: <from> → <to> " which you also didn't follow. I am going to propose to discuss this on-list because I see you have been editing bus routes across the nation and others may be interested in weighing in. |
69327505 | about 6 years ago | Hi njtbusfan,
I see you changed the name tag on many UTA bus routes to something that is more descriptive but doesn't match the official routes names from UTA. Can I ask after your rationale please? Are you local to the area? I would appreciate it if you would discuss sweeping changes like this before implementing them. Thanks,
|
68429897 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, CrowderSoup!
|
68572277 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, CrowderSoup!
|
68733914 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, CrowderSoup!
|
68888229 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, CrowderSoup!
|
68930500 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, CrowderSoup!
|
69024541 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit!
|
69098643 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, atracy!
|
69091325 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for your first OSM edit, CrowderSoup!
|
58149978 | over 6 years ago | Hi! I noticed that you modified relation osm.org/relation/8205350 in this changeset adding various from and to role ways that are not connected to the via way. As per OSM convention, a turn restriction relation should have exactly one from, one or more via, and one to role, and they should be connected to each other. See also https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=15&lat=-32.51823&lon=115.73721&layer=Grayscale&overlays=TTT and osm.wiki/Relation:restriction#Members
|
55340582 | over 7 years ago | Hello!
|
55337094 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for the updates. Great! Please make sure that areas do not overlap. In your case, the parking lot you added overlaps with some of the buildings. Not a huge deal but something to look out for in the future. |