Cool, thanks for updating quickly!

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.
Why do we use it?

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using 'Content here, content here', making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for 'lorem ipsum' will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).

Where does it come from?

Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature from 45 BC, making it over 2000 years old. Richard McClintock, a Latin professor at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, looked up one of the more obscure Latin words, consectetur, from a Lorem Ipsum passage, and going through the cites of the word in classical literature, discovered the undoubtable source. Lorem Ipsum comes from sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum" (The Extremes of Good and Evil) by Cicero, written in 45 BC. This book is a treatise on the theory of ethics, very popular during the Renaissance. The first line of Lorem Ipsum, "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..", comes from a line in section 1.10.32.

"knowledge" is most likely wrong when adding 3800+ fire hydrants? I know this is an old changeset, but if you still have / know the actual source, could you please specify? Thanks

Good catch user_5359. I noticed the change and your fix as well when I was checking the [whodidit map for this week](https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12&lat=40.66721&lon=-111.91601&layers=BTT). Let us know if you have any questions sbrunni!

If you go to that wiki page you should see a couple tabs up top: "Page" and "Discussion". The Discussion one is where we would discuss this. You will need to be logged in to the wiki to add text there. The wiki has a separate account from your main OSM account, unfortunately. I added your above comment to that page.

Thanks!

Hi, I notice you are adding directional prefixes to roads. We are currently working on a proposal for naming conventions for Utah grid streets that sticks more closely to what's on the actual road signs, following OSM's on-the-ground rule. See osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. Would you care to share your ideas and contribute to the discussion? Thanks.

Hi, welcome to OSM! Because there was already an area for Brookfield Park, there is generally no need to add a separate node for it. You can instead add the information to the existing area outline (way). Let me know if you have any questions.

Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wasn't suggesting you edit more overall (although that would be great of course!) but just suggesting you hit 'upload' more frequently while you're editing, so your changesets don't become so big as this one. That makes it easier for others to see what has been edited in a specific session.

Do you have information that the proposed highway that was here before is not in fact proposed?

Hi, thanks for your edits. May I ask upload your changes more often? That makes it easier for other mappers to see what you changed, and to have discussions about specific changes. Thank you!

Yes we have to keep an eye on this, and this user. I haven't driven on the western part of the 201 recently but large parts of it I would classify as motorway. They did mark it as expressway=true but I am not sure if that is a tag that has wide enough adoption that it warrants further blurring the trunk / motorway distinction.

Hi, thanks for your response! Actually I already did, in a subsequent change, since the surrounding parts of Bangerter Hwy were already `motorway`. I was recently there and captured some Kartaview imagery: https://kartaview.org/details/3471873/1773/track-info

If you mark a way as highway=construction, routing applications interpret that as impassable. I removed the highway=construction tagging and for now marked the ways as `trunk` but arguably they are motorway (freeway grade) there.

Alternatively you can leave it at unclassified and tag it restricted access using access=* tags. The road itself looks like it's "better than track". But open to interpretation & I don't know the area.

You're the one ringing in a new era, congrats.

Came here to look back at old milestones too :D

There's one node in here that has no name but has shop=supermarket and amenity=university.. was that a mistake?

The node is osm.org/node/1154257958

Interesting, I had no idea!

After discussing on Slack I came to the conclusion that this Challenge needs Local Knowledge in many places, so I am setting the flag to make it so. Here it is in case you want to work on it, but it won't show up in MapRoulette search any longer: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/14634

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! It looks like you were hoping to add a private apartment. The tag `tourism=apartment` is for AirBnB and similar vacation rentals. It would be sufficient to add the building the apartment is in, and add the `building=apartments` tag to it. Unless the individual apartment has a publicly known name, it shouldn't have a name in OSM.
If you have any questions please feel free to ask!

Also, please try to keep your changesets smaller, so they are easier to audit for someone who is interested in reviewing your changes. Thanks. (Case in point, in this changeset you modified the center point for the state of Utah and I would be interested to know why, and the actual change you made.)