Hi, since this canal is (completely?) underground and hard if not impossible to verify with on-the-ground survey or aerials, I am not convinced it belongs in OSM. Do you feel strongly about having it? Any particular reason for adding it?

Hi, could you please keep your changesets limited to a smaller number of edits? That makes them easier to verify. Thank you.

Yes, that is a mistake. I apologize. I created a MapRoulette challenge to review all Burger King restaurants and I was testing it. I made a mistake of including the nodes of each Burger King building as Tasks. I will revert it, review the other test tasks I'd submitted, and refresh the challenge to correct it. Thanks for pointing it out!

Hi, please take care to connect existing sidewalks so that they don't cross service roads. Thanks!

Ganesh -- source=Digital Globe is too generic to be useful. The entire OSM community has access to DG / Maxar imagery. As Kevin said, it would be useful to define some metadata that indicates that this is newer / private imagery that the general community does not (yet) has access to. Lacking that, for now, can you add a changeset tag like "note":"imagery used is more recent than what's publicly available" or something like that?

I see, so this is imagery that is not available to regular OSM mappers. Please understand that this makes it hard for the community to check your edits. It would help if you could be very specific in attributing your sources in the changeset comments, so the community at least is aware that you have access to aerials that they don't. Could you do that in the future, please?

This is what I see with publicly available imagery:

* [Maxar Premium](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/mZ6S6Yr9pK8ePHG)
* [Maxar Standard](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/xi4nPcjQAcEtdF7)
* [Bing](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/MwNgcNLazJRgrqC)

None of these images show the road as completed. My point is, unless you have some other source like on-the-ground knowledge or some proxy thereof that is publicly available (GPS traces, Mapillary, OSC) these road should be marked as construction. So I think I am missing your reference to what imagery you are using, because I would like to use the same to update the map :)

Oh also, you removed the node for the Sandy Library, and the building containing that node does not have amenity=library, so according to OSM there was no longer a library there. I added amenity=library back to the building feature, but if this is incorrect, feel free to delete it again (i.e. if this is no longer a library)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74323290

Hey there, welcome to OSM! A couple of comments on your edits if I may,
First of all, it helps with reviewing if you keep your changes within one changeset geographically contained. Saving (uploading) more often helps with that.
Second, I noticed that you deleted the existing Rice Eccles stadium football pitch and replaced it with a new feature that lacked some of the information the old feature did have (lit=yes, surface=grass_paver) was this intentional?
Thanks and happy mapping,
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74323290

I looked at both regular and Maxar Premium but neither shows the roads as completed. Could you please share a screenshot that shows the roads are completed and accessible to the public?

Hi, Maxar Standard imagery does not show these roads as completed yet, if you have another source please specify it in the changeset tags, or mark the road as construction. Thanks.

Yea, those are all good points (pun intended)

I don't feel strongly one way or the other, lately I have resorted more to mapping POI as separate nodes, and I may even have copied some POI info from a building to a node and deleted it from the building, but I realize that is just me trying to impose my mapping style on other people for no good reason..
Thanks for writing back & happy mapping

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions to the map in Utah!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73958118

Adding the POI tags to the building outline instead of keeping a separate node inside the building is okay, but not undisputed. If there's multiple POI inside one building, this tagging style doesn't work. I'm not saying you shouldn't do it this way, I just wanted to make sure you're aware of discussion around this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73984428

When you make a way into a dual-carriageway, please don't forget to adjust the lane count.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73996405

Was this business not actually closed then?
I don't know this particular tool but it seems to suggest that someone was on the ground and established that the business has closed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74012879

Thanks for your response!

Looking at the most recent imagery that seems to be available (Bing) it suggests that the roads that are marked as construction on OSM are now open. Something your GPS traces seem to confirm. So I'd mark Summit Vista Boulevard as highway=unclassified (doesn't look like service to me)

I am local but not local 'enough' to quickly go out there and check the situation myself, unfortunately.

Do you upload the GPS traces to OSM or make them available to the community some other way? That would be very useful.

Can you confirm that the roads this service road connects to in OSM are no longer under construction, but completed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73746300

Does the nickname apply to the entire trail? If that's the case, you should select the way that represents the trail and add a 'local_name' tag with that value. Let me know if you need assistance.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73768630

Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM.
You marked the entire block as building=hotel for Grand America as well as Little America. Please only use building=hotel for the actual building outline. Thank you!