New MapRoulette challenge idea: exit_to > destination
ߊ߬ ߟߊߦߟߍ߬ߣߍ߲߬ ߦߋ߫ mvexel ߓߟߏ߫ 17 September 2015 ߦߋ߫ English ߟߋ߬ ߘߐ߫ ߟߊ߬ߞߎ߬ߘߦߊ߬ߟߌ߬ ߞߐߟߕߊ 28 September 2015 ߘߐ߫K1wi’s recent diary showed us how the use of destination
is catching up with exit_to
in the US for exit sign tagging:
I am excited about this! You may recall that I am very much in favor of destination
on the _link
way to tag exit signs rather than exit_to
on the junction node.
I’ve come up with an idea to squash the remaining exit_to
-tagged nodes in the US and move the exit sign info to a destination
tag.
No scripting. No funny stuff.
A MapRoulette Challenge!
This is what it would look like:
What do you think? How can the instructions be improved?
You can try it out on dev.maproulette.org now.
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ mvexel ߟߊ߫ 17 September 2015 at 18:20 ߘߐ߫
Good point! That should definitely be explained as well. Thanks.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Baloo Uriza ߟߊ߫ 17 September 2015 at 20:16 ߘߐ߫
junction:ref=* as well! As you previously pointed out, it does obviate which direction the exit leaves the trunk or motorway!
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ mvexel ߟߊ߫ 20 September 2015 at 20:47 ߘߐ߫
You mean
junction:ref
as described here?I am not quite convinced we need it. But I do agree that it’s cleaner to have all exit info on the way rather than spread out across way and junction node.
Would require a main map style update that is probably non-trivial.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Baloo Uriza ߟߊ߫ 29 October 2015 at 10:55 ߘߐ߫
I’m pretty much convinced we need it because of the offside exit problem and navigation. However, for rendering purposes, motorway_junction’s still going to be necessary.