I noticed this edit. Looks like it's echoing a huge discussion on the Storrs wikipedia talk page.

Hi, was wondering if you can avoid gluing the former railway lines to actual features? I've seen examples where you share these nodes with buildings, landuses, roads, etc. which just creates more work for anyone who's editing actual features later. Also, from imagery I'm not sure if all of these are best tagged "abandoned" -- it appears "razed" would be better at least for some. The wiki says abandoned should be "where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure".

There is also a section from Clayton to Clear Lake - looks like it's now called the Sawmill Trail https://thestcroixvalley.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ParksDeptSawmillCountyTrail.pdf

hoping this involved samples! :)

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed a bunch of duplicate nodes appeared in MN and many seem to have come from this changeset because the warnings were not resolved before uploading. Please try to resolve warnings in the future, and it'd be great if you could fix these--see OSM Inspector https://tinyurl.com/bdzjf2td Happy mapping!

Hi, since you're editing this area, do you know if this construction was completed as planned yet? (The construction landuse is still there) I can see the new buildings in-process when slightly zoomed out on the ESRI World Imagery layer (not the Clarity Beta) and it basically aligns with your paths. Happy mapping!

That checks out with the county's online map. https://gis.hennepin.us/Property?C=477179.941168682,4989205.14278779&L=8&T=aerial&IMG=&ANNO=false&FID=0111821310148&VIS=

Hi, I noticed some large ways in this changeset that are untagged, north of Aniwa Lane. Maybe you were trying to create an area of some kind but didn't finish? If you'd be able to add tags or delete, that'd be great. Happy mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The tags you've used on this railway make it appear as if it currently exists. You should tag it as proposed (ie railway=proposed) to be more accurate, otherwise it is likely to be deleted. Even with that tag, given it is a very long range proposal, you may want to check with others about the best ways to handle this, for example on the OSM US Slack. More info specific to railway tagging is on the wiki: osm.wiki/Railways Happy mapping!

I'd say adding disused is definitely one solution. Given these bus stops were originally imported 14 years ago (osm.org/changeset/3740505) there have been and will continue to be changes, so it also seems OK to delete, especially if the sign is gone and route changed. When the sign is still there, but another sign added that the bus no longer stops there, disused probably makes the most sense. Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for adding to OpenStreetMap! I noticed in OSM Inspector that your edits created some self-intersections. https://tinyurl.com/bp5kvzx4 If you edit in this area using iD, and click on these ways it should highlight the issues. Could you take a look and try to resolve? Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for working on this golf course! Please look through the common pitfalls in golf course mapping--you seem to be doing some of them, especially adding tags as names. osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls Happy mapping!

This looks like a botched edit. I can't think of a valid reason to add addr tags to *every node* in this changeset.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Imagery does not show a hospital here. Do you have some local knowledge that it was built recently? If not, please remove it--OSM is for verifiable data only. Happy mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Imagery does not show a supermarket here. Do you have some local knowledge that it was built recently? If not, please remove it--OSM is for verifiable data only. Happy mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed you tagged these points as amenity=post_box, which is meant for outgoing mail. I think these are actually boxes where mail gets delivered, which should be amenity=letter_box. See the wiki page for more info osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box Happy mapping!

Great you connected with folks there!

I see you added a connecting way from the bridge to 40th, but didn't add that way to the Riverlake Greenway bike route relation. The relation already routed over the footway and small chunk of 2nd Ave (essentially the other two sides of the triangle formed by your new way). I think either way could work, but probably would make sense to do one or the other. If you're not sure, it might be worth asking some other local users who edit bike infrastucture (like Jordan Leick?) or on the OSM US Slack. Happy mapping!

Hi, I happened across this changeset, and am wondering why you tagged nodes as bicycle=no as well as the ways? Typically the ways are tagged and that implicitly applies to nodes within the ways as well. I don't know if it's explicitly wrong, but it's a lot of extra work with no benefit. Happy mapping!

Hi, I noticed you added both name and religion for this temple, but while the religion is Hindu, the name says Buddhist? Guessing it should be one or the other! :) If this website is the correct temple, looks like the former is correct https://svtemplemn.org/ If you could verify and update that'd be great. Happy mapping!