In this changeset, you added two place=neighbourhood nodes, but no name or other information. Please add that if you know it, or consider removing them if the tag doesn't fit (see osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood)

Thanks! I haven't been that way lately so haven't kept track of the changes.

Thanks for fixing. Are the road ways that connect to the bridge correct too? They are tagged cycleway=lane.

Hi, just a quick note that the correct key for fitness centres is leisure, not amenity (see osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre). Cheers

Hi just a quick note that the correct tag for fitness centres is leisure, not amenity. (see osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre) Happy mapping!

Hi, this data looks like it could be fictional. 1) no evidence of water (much less lakes) in the imagery, 2) this looks like a residence not a park, 3) no record of a park here in an internet search. Please give sources for these edits. Thanks!

Hi, I notice you added a leisure=gym tag. FYI, this should probably be tagged leisure=fitness_centre. See osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre

Hi, I notice you added a leisure=gym tag. FYI, this should probably be tagged leisure=fitness_centre. See osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre

FYI, self-intersections reported in OSM Inspector: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-93.12650&lat=44.66436&zoom=16&opacity=0.94

Just an FYI that two buildings in this changeset are flagged for self-intersection errors in OSM Inspector: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-93.16259&lat=44.70607&zoom=16&opacity=0.94

Not sure what to do about it now, but if you added name:eo to the Mississippi River relation, why would you also add it to each segment???

I know this is an older edit, but I noticed that the opening_hours for Mackenthun's isn't the right format. A tutorial is here for future reference (or if you want to fix this): osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours/Tutorial

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Just wanted to point out that the footpath east of the parking lot here is incorrectly mapped: a way should not double back over itself. I would probably just make each of these little loops separate ways. In case you're interested, I found this using one of the OSM QA tools, OSM Inspector: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-92.65319&lat=45.41793&zoom=18&opacity=0.93

@userJeff, OpenStreetMap is at core a project to create data which can be used to make maps, do routing, etc. Over years, guidelines have formed about the best way to do that, such as "map what's on the ground". You are mostly talking about the rendering of how the data looks and making assumptions about what *map* users want. However, what is most important to OSM is making the actual data as accurate as we can, so different *data* users can use it to make the maps, routers, or other things that they want. So, does the park actually go into the middle of the road? No, it stops next to the road. Therefore don't attach the park to the road. It may not seem relevant to you now, but there are places where highly detailed mapping is being done, and mapping this way will make it harder for future editors. Thanks

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding detail to the map, especially the Rum River. Wanted to let you know that it's best to use a multipolygon relation for riverbanks. That way, 1) you don't need to create sections of the river, and 2) the islands can be truly on their own (unconnected to the banks) tagged as "inner" parts of the relation, while the banks are tagged as "outer" parts. For example, see this area of the Rum River downstream: osm.org/relation/393154 Eventually the Rum River could all be part of this one relation! Let me know if you have questions. Cheers

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Just wanted to let you know I slightly modified this edit so that the school way covered the entire grounds and the one you drew was tagged as a building. See osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool for more info. Happy mapping!

Hi, I noticed you adding populations to administrative areas. Aside from the question of whether this is an automated edit, I am wondering what your source for this data is? The population wiki page (osm.wiki/Key:population) recommends adding source:population=* to the object, as well as population:date=* so that users can know the provenance of the population data. Thanks

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I notice in this changeset and others, you are changing road names to use abbreviations. OSM guidelines specifically say to spell out words when possible, especially for road names. See osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 for further explanation. Thanks and happy mapping!

Hi, it looks like you've uploaded some duplicate data between this changeset and changeset 50620937. Can you take a look please?

Hi, I noticed you tagged this with boundary=administrative which seems incorrect. I think this is only for governmental units, not private organizations--see osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative