Hi, way 328565829 should probably be tagged leisure=fitness_centre instead of amenity=fitness. See osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre

I think using motorway_link for the new way you added is incorrect. These are more like service roads that are only to be used by authorized vehicles

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! There is already a feature for Rosedale Center (osm.org/way/37188166) Please consider updating that with the address and contact information on this node, then deleting the node. Also note that OSM is for factual details only, and not advertising.

hi, noticed in this changeset that 1) your footways at crossings do not connect with the streets, and 2) you added separate cycleways along 14th St NW but those are already tagged on the street as cycleway=lane, which seems the preferred way to do it--see osm.wiki/Key:cycleway

The building_1 etc tags on these buildings are confusing. Are you trying to indicate what offices/departments are found in each building? Then it is probably better to place that information on nodes placed within the building's footprint. Also, please don't use abbreviations in names ("Bldg. 20"), just spell it out ("Building 20")

Instead of putting "handicap accessible" in a footway's name, please use tagging such as wheelchair=yes osm.wiki/Key:wheelchair

natural=bay seems a bit odd for Knowledge Beginnings?

why is the same poi entered multiple times? see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Hi, US road classification in OSM does not go strictly by what road network it is in, like county or state highway. See osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging

err, do you mean osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddisc_golf_course ?

I think this is incorrect. ISSS is an office inside the Humphrey, so it should be a node within the building outline

Welcome to OSM and thanks for making some edits! I'm commenting because some of the edits in this changeset seem to make the data worse not better. In particular, you deleted some buildings and replaced them with ones that are not traced as precisely and are not tagged correctly. In addition, you have added a highway=pedestrian way for a sidewalk, which is different from the usual tag to use, highway=footway. Let me know if you have questions or need help fixing these things.

thanks :)

Hi, I just noticed this changeset added piste:type=nordic to every NODE on all of these ways, which seems incorrect.

thanks for replying and giving OSM a go! remember that OSM data needs to be publicly verifiable--if these addresses are not used publicly, they're not verifiable (and probably wouldn't be of much use to people anyway). if the platforms have different addresses, then the address should be on each platform itself (ie osm.org/way/126228993), not on the station node. transit tagging is not the easiest, but if you have an interest, I think the consensus these days is found at osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport (actually, looking at that, I wonder if the station nodes should be turned into ways covering the whole area?) cheers!

some questions: 1) what is the source for the addresses you added for these platforms? even station data from Metro Transit doesn't have an address. 2) you repurposed the general Snelling Ave station node into something just for the EB platform, which is different from all other MT LRT stations--is there a reason for this? thanks

Hi, just an FYI, if you're testing for an import, you'll want to check out osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines If not, for future I'd recommend camel-casing attributes (such as city name and street names), and making sure street names are unabbreviated. Either way, thanks for adding to the map!

This is advertising through vandalism. I am deleting the tags you added to this way.

hi, just wanted to let you know that the best tag for fitness centers is leisure=fitness_centre (see osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre)

hi, just wanted to let you know that the best tag for fitness centers is leisure=fitness_centre (see osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre)