Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. One thing to fix: you have tagged your business office as a shop=supermarket, but the correct tag would instead be craft=plumber. If you could fix this, it'd look pretty good. Thanks and happy mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping golf courses. However, please do put text in a hole's name tag unless it has a name other than the number (for example, Augusta National's hole #1 is also known as "Tea Olive"). If there is no name but a ref #, the hole will be displayed with the #. Happy mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Something to think about for the future: instead of deleting the node, you could just delete the tags with store info, and leave the node with the addr:housenumber, addr:streetname, and level info. Then someone in the future would potentially be able to reuse the node when there is a new store there. Happy mapping!

Nice job adding detail to golf courses! One note about holes: the hole number will be rendered if it's in the ref value (in iD editor it says Hole Number). The name value should only be used if it has a name other than the number--for example Augusta National's hole #1 is "Tea Olive", or Whistling Strait's hole #1 is "Outward Bound." More info on the wiki if you're interested: osm.wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole Happy mapping!

According to the wiki "a mini-roundabout is a special type of roundabout in which the middle can be traversed by vehicles". That is not the case here. In fact there's signage on roads leading to this intersection saying trucks should not go this way because it's so narrow. Regarding the building, I think old_name=Speedway would work, but it is not in signage or function a Speedway anymore so that having that as the name doesn't meet the on the ground rule.

The big thing is I'm not sure why you removed the roundabout around the fist? I went there yesterday and double-checked the roads don't go straight through and don't meet in the middle. Also not sure why you renamed the People's Way--it's not a Speedway anymore.

Sounds good, thanks for clarifying!

Hi, some of these changes don't seem to match what's on the ground--can you give more information about your sources?

I noticed a gap of different classification at S 4th St near the courthouse. The 2nd wiki page you cite talks about not creating islands of classification based solely on traffic counts, so I hope you're keeping that in mind, as well as trying to ensure classifications maintain a connected network when viewed as a whole. Not criticizing what you've done, but just pointing out there's a bit of art as well as science to US road classifications...as you can tell from the ~15 years of discussions on this topic with no clear resolution! :)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and congrats on changeset #1! For situations like this where there are two different points of interest within one building, it's common to create two nodes within the building, one for the restaurant and one for the grocery store. Hope this makes sense. Thanks again for contributing and happy mapping!

Hi, I noticed you removed the periods from a bunch of things near U.S. Bank Stadium. This seems to be an error according to local sources. For example, Metro Transit includes the periods in the light rail stop name online: https://www.metrotransit.org/imap/0/56330 And on the U.S. Bank Stadium's media page, it includes the periods: https://www.usbankstadium.com/connect-with-us/media-information Would appreciate if you can fix these please. Thanks!

FYI some of the name:etymology:wikidata tags have the name instead of the Q #

Hi, I noticed you retagged the playground to be leisure=fitness_center, which isn't a valid tag. leisure=fitness_centre is used for places like health clubs/gyms, but that doesn't seem to fit this place. leisure=fitness_station is used for outdoor fitness equipment--is that what you're thinking of? Happy mapping!

Hi, I was curious why you deleted the proposed Bottineau LRT line--not clear from your changeset comment

No problem, there are a lot of options to tagging, especially with access restrictions! One thing to remember is that we only edit the data, then routers can take that data and use it to help people navigate. So if you've been seeing people ride bikes through the golf course and they shouldn't be, you can add something specific like bicycle=no to the paths. Will that stop people from biking through? No, but it will stop people from being *routed* through if the router uses OSM data. If you use a router, you may be able to find out how often they update it, then see if your changes made a difference.

Hi, it looks like you made two changes which are against the recommended tagging for golf carts:
1) removed highway=service ("In May 2019, the access tag golf_cart=* was approved to be used with highway tags instead of this tag." osm.wiki/Tag:golf=cartpath).
2) changed the access from designated to permissive (permissive is actually...more permissive "Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission..." and designated is far more common for cart paths https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/golf_cart#values ) Hope you find this useful--happy mapping!

OK, then I'm not sure what landuse=ritual is supposed to mean. From reading the wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam-ondi-Ahman) it could be tagged with place=locality (a place with a name but no population), or possibly one of the historic tags.

On the river name, according to the Thompson River wikipedia entry, "In Iowa, it is known simply as the Grand River and passes near the city of Grand River." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_River_(Missouri) It'd probably be best for someone local to take a look--you could add a note.

Hi, landuse=ritual is not a tag that is used. Maybe you are looking for something related to place of worship? osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109421828

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears you're editing a number of industrial-related tags in this changeset, but it's not clear from your "general updating" changeset comment why. Could you clarify the reasoning for your changes? Thanks much and happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109415942

Great--do you work for the MPRB? Either way, if you're bringing outside data into OSM, make sure it's compatible with OSM's license :) Info at the Imports wiki page: osm.wiki/Import