neuhausr's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
31501270 | about 10 years ago | fyi, the fitness stations should be leisure=fitness_station, not amenity=fitness_station |
31621017 | about 10 years ago | a better way to handle a vacant building is the disused tag, for example disused:office=yes (see osm.wiki/Key:disused:) |
28308743 | about 10 years ago | Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits?? |
31180195 | about 10 years ago | Some of the wikipedia links are bad on the Chipotles. Not to mention, giving every individual restaurant its own link to the Chipotle wikipedia page seems like overkill??? |
29915788 | about 10 years ago | Sorry, had never seen a tag like old_leisure. I added that tag back |
30672483 | over 10 years ago | Hi Tomarr, I'm noticing that in the southern area of this changeset at least, you added duplicate data (for example, buildings around buildings). In addition, all the corners of the buildings are also tagged building=yes. I've fixed (removed) some, but you might take a look, as well as try and avoid this issue in the future. Cheers! |
30076853 | over 10 years ago | You added this node with some unusual tags, so it's unclear what is meant by them. I'd recommend you change as mentioned below. 1) You seem to imply that the area is not currently known as Harris Creek. If this is true, you could probably tag with old_name instead of name. 2) Active is not a documented key, it's not clear what it means in this context, and it's rarely used--probably best to delete. 3) Places are not usually tagged historic, and historic=yes is "best avoided" according to the wiki, so you might want to delete that too. 4) If you don't know the population, just remove that tag. |
24335135 | over 10 years ago | It's been nine months, you should be able to delete this "test data" now |
3021628 | over 10 years ago | Look at the node linked above--that one and others near it have a building tag, but are nowhere near a building. Maybe using the centroid worked within a town, but not in rural area? Other points don't even have an address--why were those even imported? It'd be nice if you could clean up the data. |
30187120 | over 10 years ago | Hi and welcome to OSM! Noticed your edit in the area and wanted to point out a couple things: 1) buildings should be traced to represent their outline, it doesn't look like this is a round house :) 2) it's not common to label who lives at a particular house. not to say you can't do it, but remember this is open data and may end up displaying in places you don't expect... |
28484731 | over 10 years ago | another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key |
28973598 | over 10 years ago | there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few) |
29578599 | over 10 years ago | Just an FYI, the Nachusa boundary was not closed properly, I think I've fixed it and the tagging. Please verify :) osm.org/way/333487229 |
25088067 | over 10 years ago | I didn't follow the whole way, but at least parts of these lines don't appear to meet the standard on the wiki for "abandoned"--they're more like razed (osm.wiki/Railways#Life-cycle) Can you please review and retag as appropriate? |
26901381 | over 10 years ago | I noticed that you "creatively" named some alleys in this changeset. OpenStreetMap is not a "sandbox" environment, so all changes affect the data for everyone. Please correct these edits, provide sources for the names, or your whole changeset may be reverted. Thanks |
25375437 | over 10 years ago | hi, it's unclear to me what you're adding with this (and a couple other similar nodes). is it a mile marker? if so, it should be tagged highway=milestone. if not, I'm not sure if it's good data to add to OSM from what I can tell: 1) it doesn't seem to be an observable feature, 2) it could be derived from the data, and 3) I don't know what a use case would be for it |
19388570 | over 10 years ago | Why did you change Aldens Corners to an isolated dwelling (wiki: "Smallest kind of human settlement. No more than 2 households.")? it clearly has more than two residences. Looks like you've done the same with other places tagged hamlet too. |
27978721 | over 10 years ago | From spot checking, it looks like you tagged many of these roads' maxspeed twice |
28148682 | over 10 years ago | Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See osm.org/way/322503620, osm.org/way/322114569, osm.org/way/322114772, osm.org/way/322503687 |
28384348 | over 10 years ago | welcome to OSM! just a quick tip: don't include =* in the key tag. when something like highway=* is mentioned in the wiki where it's talking about key=value combinations, it means the key is highway and the value can be anything. if you look at the tags for the Edgewood Place way, you should get the idea. cheers! |