OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
31501270 about 10 years ago

fyi, the fitness stations should be leisure=fitness_station, not amenity=fitness_station

31621017 about 10 years ago

a better way to handle a vacant building is the disused tag, for example disused:office=yes (see osm.wiki/Key:disused:)

28308743 about 10 years ago

Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??

31180195 about 10 years ago

Some of the wikipedia links are bad on the Chipotles. Not to mention, giving every individual restaurant its own link to the Chipotle wikipedia page seems like overkill???

29915788 about 10 years ago

Sorry, had never seen a tag like old_leisure. I added that tag back

30672483 over 10 years ago

Hi Tomarr, I'm noticing that in the southern area of this changeset at least, you added duplicate data (for example, buildings around buildings). In addition, all the corners of the buildings are also tagged building=yes. I've fixed (removed) some, but you might take a look, as well as try and avoid this issue in the future. Cheers!

30076853 over 10 years ago

You added this node with some unusual tags, so it's unclear what is meant by them. I'd recommend you change as mentioned below. 1) You seem to imply that the area is not currently known as Harris Creek. If this is true, you could probably tag with old_name instead of name. 2) Active is not a documented key, it's not clear what it means in this context, and it's rarely used--probably best to delete. 3) Places are not usually tagged historic, and historic=yes is "best avoided" according to the wiki, so you might want to delete that too. 4) If you don't know the population, just remove that tag.

24335135 over 10 years ago

It's been nine months, you should be able to delete this "test data" now

3021628 over 10 years ago

Look at the node linked above--that one and others near it have a building tag, but are nowhere near a building. Maybe using the centroid worked within a town, but not in rural area? Other points don't even have an address--why were those even imported? It'd be nice if you could clean up the data.

30187120 over 10 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM! Noticed your edit in the area and wanted to point out a couple things: 1) buildings should be traced to represent their outline, it doesn't look like this is a round house :) 2) it's not common to label who lives at a particular house. not to say you can't do it, but remember this is open data and may end up displaying in places you don't expect...

28484731 over 10 years ago

another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key

28973598 over 10 years ago

there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few)

29578599 over 10 years ago

Just an FYI, the Nachusa boundary was not closed properly, I think I've fixed it and the tagging. Please verify :) osm.org/way/333487229

25088067 over 10 years ago

I didn't follow the whole way, but at least parts of these lines don't appear to meet the standard on the wiki for "abandoned"--they're more like razed (osm.wiki/Railways#Life-cycle) Can you please review and retag as appropriate?

26901381 over 10 years ago

I noticed that you "creatively" named some alleys in this changeset. OpenStreetMap is not a "sandbox" environment, so all changes affect the data for everyone. Please correct these edits, provide sources for the names, or your whole changeset may be reverted. Thanks

25375437 over 10 years ago

hi, it's unclear to me what you're adding with this (and a couple other similar nodes). is it a mile marker? if so, it should be tagged highway=milestone. if not, I'm not sure if it's good data to add to OSM from what I can tell: 1) it doesn't seem to be an observable feature, 2) it could be derived from the data, and 3) I don't know what a use case would be for it

19388570 over 10 years ago

Why did you change Aldens Corners to an isolated dwelling (wiki: "Smallest kind of human settlement. No more than 2 households.")? it clearly has more than two residences. Looks like you've done the same with other places tagged hamlet too.

27978721 over 10 years ago

From spot checking, it looks like you tagged many of these roads' maxspeed twice

28148682 over 10 years ago

Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See osm.org/way/322503620, osm.org/way/322114569, osm.org/way/322114772, osm.org/way/322503687

28384348 over 10 years ago

welcome to OSM! just a quick tip: don't include =* in the key tag. when something like highway=* is mentioned in the wiki where it's talking about key=value combinations, it means the key is highway and the value can be anything. if you look at the tags for the Edgewood Place way, you should get the idea. cheers!