OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
31968544 about 10 years ago

I had heard of wheelmap but hadn't looked closely until now. It seems odd that some buildings show up there and others don't. Pretty much all things that "look" like buildings on the map at wheelmap.org are buildings in OSM. You can add the same info directly via OSM.org, but it's not quite as easy :(

31968544 about 10 years ago

Hi, this info on wheelchair accessibility is really useful, but if there is an existing building drawn, can you add it to that building's way instead of creating a new point? I did so on Coffman, but left Kolthoff and Smith if you want to do those. Thanks!

32264675 about 10 years ago

Hi, I think you mistagged the MN Kali Group as a bank. Should probably be amenity=dojo. Thanks for mapping!

31935292 about 10 years ago

wondering why you made this a coastline?? that tag is reserved for ocean coasts only (the great lakes are a notable exception) because it's much harder to deal with both in editing and rendering

32066219 about 10 years ago

Hey lizzzzz, fyi, I'm changing the LifeTime to leisure=fitness_centre, per discussion on osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre. Let me know if Qs

32065277 about 10 years ago

Hi, noticed that you appear relatively new, and just wanted to point out a couple things that are non-standard about this edit: 1) a way for a restaurant will usually be the building only and not include the parking area, 2) generally if you make a way for a restaurant, and there's also a node, you should remove the node so that there is only one object in OSM per feature. Hope this helps and happy mapping!

31754546 about 10 years ago

I'm guessing this wasn't really based on the Nepal imagery? :) (see changeset source)

31501270 about 10 years ago

fyi, the fitness stations should be leisure=fitness_station, not amenity=fitness_station

31621017 about 10 years ago

a better way to handle a vacant building is the disused tag, for example disused:office=yes (see osm.wiki/Key:disused:)

28308743 about 10 years ago

Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??

31180195 about 10 years ago

Some of the wikipedia links are bad on the Chipotles. Not to mention, giving every individual restaurant its own link to the Chipotle wikipedia page seems like overkill???

29915788 about 10 years ago

Sorry, had never seen a tag like old_leisure. I added that tag back

30672483 about 10 years ago

Hi Tomarr, I'm noticing that in the southern area of this changeset at least, you added duplicate data (for example, buildings around buildings). In addition, all the corners of the buildings are also tagged building=yes. I've fixed (removed) some, but you might take a look, as well as try and avoid this issue in the future. Cheers!

30076853 over 10 years ago

You added this node with some unusual tags, so it's unclear what is meant by them. I'd recommend you change as mentioned below. 1) You seem to imply that the area is not currently known as Harris Creek. If this is true, you could probably tag with old_name instead of name. 2) Active is not a documented key, it's not clear what it means in this context, and it's rarely used--probably best to delete. 3) Places are not usually tagged historic, and historic=yes is "best avoided" according to the wiki, so you might want to delete that too. 4) If you don't know the population, just remove that tag.

24335135 over 10 years ago

It's been nine months, you should be able to delete this "test data" now

3021628 over 10 years ago

Look at the node linked above--that one and others near it have a building tag, but are nowhere near a building. Maybe using the centroid worked within a town, but not in rural area? Other points don't even have an address--why were those even imported? It'd be nice if you could clean up the data.

30187120 over 10 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM! Noticed your edit in the area and wanted to point out a couple things: 1) buildings should be traced to represent their outline, it doesn't look like this is a round house :) 2) it's not common to label who lives at a particular house. not to say you can't do it, but remember this is open data and may end up displaying in places you don't expect...

28484731 over 10 years ago

another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key

28973598 over 10 years ago

there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few)

29578599 over 10 years ago

Just an FYI, the Nachusa boundary was not closed properly, I think I've fixed it and the tagging. Please verify :) osm.org/way/333487229