neuhausr's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
31968544 | about 10 years ago | I had heard of wheelmap but hadn't looked closely until now. It seems odd that some buildings show up there and others don't. Pretty much all things that "look" like buildings on the map at wheelmap.org are buildings in OSM. You can add the same info directly via OSM.org, but it's not quite as easy :( |
31968544 | about 10 years ago | Hi, this info on wheelchair accessibility is really useful, but if there is an existing building drawn, can you add it to that building's way instead of creating a new point? I did so on Coffman, but left Kolthoff and Smith if you want to do those. Thanks! |
32264675 | about 10 years ago | Hi, I think you mistagged the MN Kali Group as a bank. Should probably be amenity=dojo. Thanks for mapping! |
31935292 | about 10 years ago | wondering why you made this a coastline?? that tag is reserved for ocean coasts only (the great lakes are a notable exception) because it's much harder to deal with both in editing and rendering |
32066219 | about 10 years ago | Hey lizzzzz, fyi, I'm changing the LifeTime to leisure=fitness_centre, per discussion on osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre. Let me know if Qs |
32065277 | about 10 years ago | Hi, noticed that you appear relatively new, and just wanted to point out a couple things that are non-standard about this edit: 1) a way for a restaurant will usually be the building only and not include the parking area, 2) generally if you make a way for a restaurant, and there's also a node, you should remove the node so that there is only one object in OSM per feature. Hope this helps and happy mapping! |
31754546 | about 10 years ago | I'm guessing this wasn't really based on the Nepal imagery? :) (see changeset source) |
31501270 | about 10 years ago | fyi, the fitness stations should be leisure=fitness_station, not amenity=fitness_station |
31621017 | about 10 years ago | a better way to handle a vacant building is the disused tag, for example disused:office=yes (see osm.wiki/Key:disused:) |
28308743 | about 10 years ago | Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits?? |
31180195 | about 10 years ago | Some of the wikipedia links are bad on the Chipotles. Not to mention, giving every individual restaurant its own link to the Chipotle wikipedia page seems like overkill??? |
29915788 | about 10 years ago | Sorry, had never seen a tag like old_leisure. I added that tag back |
30672483 | about 10 years ago | Hi Tomarr, I'm noticing that in the southern area of this changeset at least, you added duplicate data (for example, buildings around buildings). In addition, all the corners of the buildings are also tagged building=yes. I've fixed (removed) some, but you might take a look, as well as try and avoid this issue in the future. Cheers! |
30076853 | over 10 years ago | You added this node with some unusual tags, so it's unclear what is meant by them. I'd recommend you change as mentioned below. 1) You seem to imply that the area is not currently known as Harris Creek. If this is true, you could probably tag with old_name instead of name. 2) Active is not a documented key, it's not clear what it means in this context, and it's rarely used--probably best to delete. 3) Places are not usually tagged historic, and historic=yes is "best avoided" according to the wiki, so you might want to delete that too. 4) If you don't know the population, just remove that tag. |
24335135 | over 10 years ago | It's been nine months, you should be able to delete this "test data" now |
3021628 | over 10 years ago | Look at the node linked above--that one and others near it have a building tag, but are nowhere near a building. Maybe using the centroid worked within a town, but not in rural area? Other points don't even have an address--why were those even imported? It'd be nice if you could clean up the data. |
30187120 | over 10 years ago | Hi and welcome to OSM! Noticed your edit in the area and wanted to point out a couple things: 1) buildings should be traced to represent their outline, it doesn't look like this is a round house :) 2) it's not common to label who lives at a particular house. not to say you can't do it, but remember this is open data and may end up displaying in places you don't expect... |
28484731 | over 10 years ago | another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key |
28973598 | over 10 years ago | there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few) |
29578599 | over 10 years ago | Just an FYI, the Nachusa boundary was not closed properly, I think I've fixed it and the tagging. Please verify :) osm.org/way/333487229 |