OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
54395961 over 7 years ago

Hi, is there a reason you deleted the main outer way for the Fort Shafter relation?

54251682 over 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM! I noticed that you have overlapped some of the parking aisles near Ridgeway Center. In general it's best to create some ways that go through an area or form its edges, then fill in with single ways. Here is a link to a QA tool which might help you visualize the issue: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-89.86711&lat=35.10545&zoom=17&opacity=0.84 Happy mapping!

54642785 over 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding to the map. One hint: I noticed the footway near Spruce and CH 134 overlaps itself. Instead, you would want to create two ways here--for example, one that goes to the NE, and one that connects to it and goes to the NW. Happy mapping!

54578730 over 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM! There are a couple places you have overlapped a way (ie osm.org/way/546438255 and osm.org/way/546438222) In cases like this, please create one way, then start a second that branches off the first instead of making it all one feature. Thanks!

54054461 over 7 years ago

Hi, could you fix multipolygon relation 7757190 so that the outer and inner parts of the building are separate? Let me know if you have questions

54412567 over 7 years ago

Hi, it looks like the building and park may have gotten accidentally connected to the end of West School Street, could you take a look? Also, Morehouse Park should probably be one large area instead of multiple little ones. Park boundaries should generally encompass whatever is in them--roads, buildings, baseball fields, water, etc.

54420130 over 7 years ago

Hi, just an fyi that it's more common to tag fairgrounds as tourism=attraction. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tO7 for examples

54583883 over 7 years ago

Hi, deleting all this seems kind of questionable. By deleting the existing library building, you removed a lot of other information about the library that was in the tags of that way. You also deleted some roof-only sections of the building. You mention fixes to pedestrian areas, but I'm not clear what improvements you made to them. Indoor mapping doesn't always "look good" in a standard rendering but in general if the data is accurate, there needs to be a very good reason to redo/remove it.

54554041 over 7 years ago

Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map! In a strip mall like this, it would be better practice to create a building for the entire structure, and then add nodes for each business within the mall, rather than create individual areas for only some of the stores. Also note, landuse tags should not be used on buildings or stores. Teppanyaki Grill should probably be tagged amenity=restaurant, Duluth Trading should be shop=clothes, etc.

54558689 over 7 years ago

Hi, I notice you previously updated the address of this point, but didn't move its location to the new address--are you planning to do that? Also, you might want to add an office tag if that's appropriate (see osm.wiki/Key:office for values)

54445368 over 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM! I see you flagged "review requested" and these edits look good to me. For businesses, you might also consider adding address, phone #, website, and (if you're feeling adventurous) opening hours. Happy mapping!

48971667 over 7 years ago

Hi, wondering why you created this Edgewood College way that includes the High School and Campus School too? The college is just a part of this area, and they are all independent though related schools. (ie see https://www.edgewood.edu/docs/default-source/aboutdocs/directions/campusmap.pdf)

51023916 over 7 years ago

Hi, it appears you uploaded a bunch of duplicate nodes in this changeset--can you please clean that up?

53718141 over 7 years ago

As Ellen Ripley said to Cpl Hicks, "it's the only way to be sure" :)

53718141 over 7 years ago

Thanks!

53718141 over 7 years ago

what is the source for this data? it appears to be an apartment building

44607666 over 7 years ago

Hi, I know this is old, but this path seems incorrect--features should generally be able to be seen on the ground and verified. The horse fest path looks like it's a temporary feature? If so it should be removed.

53194824 over 7 years ago

Congrats! Looks like a cool place.

53194824 almost 8 years ago

Hi, I am a local mapper and noticed the recent edits to this node's tags. I think amenity=events_venue would be the best tag, as amenity=community_centre is for public places, and this appears to be a private venue.

46172235 almost 8 years ago

Hi, I noticed you created these walking paths as one long line. Instead of doing this and creating overlapping paths, you should create smaller lines that connect to each other at nodes. Thanks for mapping!