neuhausr's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
59215310 | about 7 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for adding to the map! Note that there are better tags for some of the features you created, such as leisure=beach and waterway=waterfall. If you haven't done it yet, you may find it useful to do the iD Editor's walkthrough too. Happy mapping! |
58093786 | about 7 years ago | Hi, it appears this data largely duplicates buildings in changeset 58093393 |
58922154 | about 7 years ago | Just an FYI, this appears to be the changeset comment from your previous changeset in Michigan... |
58857167 | about 7 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map! It's great you're adding the crossing tag to the footways which cross streets, however those crossing ways should also join the street at a node where they actually intersect. Also, you've tagged some things that look like alleys from the imagery as unclassified streets. If they are alleys, use highway=service, service=alley. Happy mapping! |
58775727 | about 7 years ago | Hi, thanks for your edits! However, I'd like to suggest some improvements to your mapping practice based on this changeset: 1) the name tag should only be used if there's an actual name, not as a description of what an object is, 2) if you do use a name, capitalize it correctly, 3) ways should not overlap themselves as is done to the NW here, break them into smaller chunks that are connected, 4) pay attention to the interaction of different features. Here the footway overlaps the lake in two places, should the lake outline be adjusted? should a section be tagged as a bridge? Also, if a footway connects to a street in reality, make sure to connect them on the map. Hope you don't feel criticized, these are common things I see relatively new mappers do, and just want to let you know so you can improve. Happy mapping! |
58250610 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for updating Ramsey to Justice Page! However, could you please update the amenity=school area instead of the building itself? This is the general recommendation for schools--see osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool Happy mapping! |
58113199 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map! I notice the way you a few things in this changeset could be better: 1) the building tag should just be for the area of a building--there are other tags like landuse for areas (ie the larger area of OSI could be landuse=industrial or commercial), 2) if trails actually connect to streets, make sure to connect them in the data to help with routing, 3) instead of describing the use or condition of a path in the name, use tags like surface and access--see the path page on the wiki: osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath These sort of things are common as newer users learn some of the details of OSM, so no worries. Happy mapping! |
57647947 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! One principle of OSM is "One feature, one OSM element" (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element), so when a feature already exists (as is the case with buildings of Alexander Ramsey House and Minnehaha Station), one shouldn't add it again. Maybe you were unable to see that they already existed when using mapswithme? Anyway, just an FYI that I'll remove the nodes which duplicate the features. |
57337581 | over 7 years ago | Hi, I am a local mapper, and noticed that @user_5359 removed the description from this node (as it seemed to just be advertising) and you added it back in. Just curious, especially since you apparently do digital advertising, is this information actually of use to others? Because I don't know people would see the description field in a map or even search engine. |
57080775 | over 7 years ago | If it's no longer there, you can just delete it :) In iD, just select the way, right click, and select Delete |
57080775 | over 7 years ago | Hi, your tagged construction area overlaps with an existing building--is that building being torn down, or is the construction area smaller than you drew? |
56556408 | over 7 years ago | Hi, if construction is complete, you should replace the construction key with amenity and update the name. Is this the Ambulatory Outpatient Specialty Center? |
54379317 | over 7 years ago | Hi just an FYI that the tag and area traced don't match for the townhomes. You can leave the area as is and retag as landuse=residential, or use the building tag and trace the outline of the actual buildings. Note also that the building tag should describe the building's , not its owner. Townhomes would probably be building=terrace (osm.wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace) If you want to note the college, you could use another tag such as operator. |
12991447 | over 7 years ago | Since it's been a few years since you added it to the name, wanted to check if County Road 13 is still a US 14 detour? |
55699658 | over 7 years ago | Hi, I am another OSM editor in the area and just wanted to point out a couple things you might keep in mind going forward: 1) If an area (like the farmland southeast of Cty Rd 50 and Halsey Ave) has an "island" in it of a different type of area (like the forested area), you should create a multipolygon relation and tag the "outer" and "inner" areas separately as described here: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/22542/how-do-i-map-an-island-in-a-lake-using-id-editor-and-the-multipolygon-tag 2) it's not a hard rule, but generally recommended that landuse-type areas not attach to roads, and instead stop where they actually stop (usually next to a road--see osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes). Aside from being more accurate, it often makes future editing easier. Thanks again for all your editing and happy future mapping! |
55533258 | over 7 years ago | No, it didn't overwrite it, it wrote it to the database again. Since the features are exact duplicates, they are hard to see unless you move one feature and uncover the copy beneath. For example, see the parking lot and houses to the east of St. Michael Elementary School. I think a revert would be good. |
54461696 | over 7 years ago | Hi, thanks for adding detail to OSM in this area. One request: could you please turn the "caps lock" off? Names of parks and other features should be capitalized normally. Thanks again and happy mapping! |
55533258 | over 7 years ago | Hi it looks like this changeset has duplicated most of changeset 55533231? (see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55533231 and https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55533258) |
55789103 | over 7 years ago | Hi, thanks for adding detail to the area! I notice you've added some driveways for some houses, but not all of them actually connect to the street--for example along 147th Terrace. While they should connect to the sidewalk, they should then continue to the street. Happy mapping! |
55949849 | over 7 years ago | Hi, thanks for adding so much detail to this area recently! I noticed that some of your edits are creating geometry errors, though. (you can see them here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?lon=-94.01&lat=45.64&zoom=7) For example, the residential landuse area around the Karsten Ave Lake should use a multipolygon relation instead of a narrow line going to the "island". See this forum for some tips on creating relations in iD: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/58270/how-i-can-create-relation-in-id-editor Or feel free to message me if you have questions. Happy mapping! |