I accidentally created this changeset without a comment. The comment should have been:

Added some missing addresses on Winchcombe Street and tidy up some nearby buildings.

Hi.

Thank you for changing the nearby road back to a service road as I requested.

I'm not sure why you have added a path. There is no path on the ground. Your comment implies that a path is necessary as is there is a service road. That's not correct. A service road does not preclude or necessarily prohibit foot access in itself. The service road is tagged with foot=designated since it is a public right of way.

Please remove the path you added.

Happy to help with any questions you have.

Thanks,
Nick

Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap--it's great to have more people to improve the map.

In this changeset, you've changed osm.org/way/263281130 from a service road to a residential one. This is a service road: it provides access to facilities at a rugby club. Would you mind changing it back to a service road, please? ☺

In another changeset, you changed osm.org/way/540025132 from a footway to a path. In OpenStreetMap, "path" is more generic: it can be practically anything (an unofficial path, a cycleway, ...). "footway" clearly specifies that a way is for use on foot.

Thanks,
Nick

Hi,

That way isn't officially Hambrook Terrace. Named terraces are often invisible on the map, so sometimes I'll add a name like this, even though it's not strictly correct.

Maybe the name would be better on way 839121813, in a similar style to way 563124895.

Thanks,
Nick

Hi,

Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it.

Nick

I entered a changeset comment for this change, but JOSM didn't upload it. I encountered this bug before. It's rare and I can't reproduce it. Somehow JOSM gets into a state where the comment and source boxes are empty, but JOSM thinks a comment has been entered (as the warning for an empty or short comment is not shown). Any comment entered is disregarded.

The comment for this changeset should have been:

"Improve alignment and geometry of buildings and roads in Charlton Kings and Leckhampton".

Hi,

Sorry for the slow reply.

I'd say 67257 is redundant now. I don't think there is any need to move ways from it into 269708, as 269708 already has the ways in it.

Thanks,
Nick

Somehow, JOSM didn't use the changeset comment that I entered, so here it is: "Added some missing house numbers and names in Lansdown, Cheltenham. Also improved road alignment."

You're right, it should not be tagged as a building. The perimeter is mostly a metal fence, with an outer hedge in places (mostly along Saint Johns Avenue).

Thanks for pointing this out. I added it by mistake. I've fixed it now.

Hi,

I meant not tagged with the name, as I'm not sure the path is known by that name. It's a bit more nuanced though if the path is named on Cleeve Common's schematic, but that's arguably more for illustrative purposes rather than being a definitive source of the name.

Thanks,
NIck

Hi :)

Is osm.org/way/105591747 really called "Main Path"?

Thanks,
Nick

Hi,

It looks like the node you added for St Paul's (osm.org/node/7619436096) might be a duplicate of osm.org/node/5629209348.

I'm not sure which node is in the most appropriate location, but I don't think we need two for St Paul's.

Could you take a look, please? :)

Great work--BIshop's Cleeve was a little sparse building-wise, and it looks like you've added all of them now :)

Thanks for these changes. I'm pleased to see Tamil names being added, but I think you need to use name:ta instead of name:tam. Taginfo shows under 50 uses of name:tam globally.

Added not:name and source:not:name. Thanks.

Is alt_name the best tag for this? The street has not actually been known by that name (except by error on some maps). Would not:name be more appropriate here?

Hi. Unfortunately I don't understand what the designation is of Wymans Brook east of Pittville Lake. In this change I just fixed the direction, and (apparently) clarified that the brook is not part of River Chelt. Good luck for finding out :)

Hi :) By coincidence, I visited Southfield Manor Park last week. "Southfild Manor" (way 627640005) is signed as "Southfield Manor" outside it, so I'd use that as the name, and "Southfild Manor" as alt_name or old_name. Thanks.

Hi. Thanks for helping to improve the map in Singapore, particularly in Bukit Timah Nature Reserve. In future, please don't use generic names like "stream" or "footpath" for features; instead, please tag the features appropriately :) Thanks