please do not remove the wikidata tag - they are critical for data validation and cross-referencing with external data for wikipedia

When you replaced religion=unknown with religion=*, is this a special tag? i don't think =* has any meaning

This edit changed way 332308716 - religion= christian to "Zuluetismo." -- seems wrong - was that a revert bug?

Is this a fake?

Hi, please check way 469214745 -- it is not valid, it only has two nodes.

Sorry, my mistake, fixed. Thanks for catching it! Please take a look at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/Wikidata_OSM_questions -- see if we can come up with some overall guidelines for wp/wd tags. And see if you can help with https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_disambigs - there are tons more of the disambigs there. Thanks!

Hi, I am not sure what this edit means. Please elaborate, or I will delete it as an error.

@trial, thanks for checking. There are two different ways with the same wikipedia tag: 64658252 and 42862082 (in Paris and in Nancy), but the WP article https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_d%27%C3%A9tudes_politiques_de_Paris points only to Paris location. Also, there is a relation 907555 that unites all the buildings in Paris. I have moved the wikipedia tag to the relation (in Paris), but I suspect adding wikipedia tag to a branch might be a mistake. Should we perhaps use some other tag like branch:wikipedia=..., or "about:wikipedia="...?

Seriously? A region that is a movie? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To%27hajiilee Deleting it. If it's actually about the Indian reservation, please revert. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tohajiilee_Indian_Reservation

Hi, I removed the invalid wikidata tag. Wikidata tag is a number that begins with a letter Q from wikidata.org

@verdy_p, thanks for a thorough answer! I was simply referring to the JOSM complaining that there is no boundary tag for the type=boundary relation. We should either change the validation rules and update wiki, or add some boundary=... tag, or change type= tag to something else.

Thanks! Sorry for the mistake.

Seems like this change totally broke relation 1193987

Hi, in 4 subsequent changes, you removed all of the ways from the relation 182152. Is it needed, or should it be deleted?

Hi, the ways you created here: 366312844
and 366312840, do not seem to be correct. They look like part of waterways of sorts. I'm removing their boundary tags, but please correct if you know what they are, or delete them. Thanks!

Hi, I reverted this changeset because I suspect it was an accident - clearly this is not a bridge. Let me know if it should be fixed further, thanks!

Hi, the border you created - www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6676059 seems to be incomplete, and it has incorrect admin_level. Are you planning on finishing it, or should it be deleted? Thanks!

Ok, done - all Milwaukee neighborhoods (wikidata=Q6988108) have been fixed - i created wd items for them

Escada, unless there is a more specific Wikidata item, why can't multiple objects reference the same Wikidata item? I would like to avoid that, but it is still better to have a link that allows cross-db analysis, than to not have anything. I looked through OSM wiki about wikidata tag, and nothing there implies 1:1. After all, a wikidata item that contains a link to a set of wikipedia articles would be relevant for both levels.

My apologies, I have simply added the corresponding wikidata tag to the admin areas that have wikipedia tags. The iD does it automatically whenever you set Wikipedia tag. We should probably at some point automate this for all nodes, but this is a separate and long discussion ahead :)