Hi,

I can see there is a lot of "temporary" markers in numerous golf courses. If they don't represent real world features, then I don't understand why they are in the database. If they are needed for software compatibility then that is a software issue, not an OSM issue?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, I've deleted these cartpaths in osm.org/changeset/107294146 as the roads already exist and aren't cartpaths.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Nice catch didn't notice that one, will go through and correct occurrences tomorrow.

Thanks,
ortho

I would agree with ScottWalker here; the footway=sidewalk tag is to provide additional, more specific information about the type of footway (it's a well established tag e.g. https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/footway/sidewalk)

Hi, if the path is dirt, then it would be best to tag it as 'dirt'. 'unpaved' is just a catch all term for everything, whereas dirt is a more specific value.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, do you think this is better marked as residential rather than tertiary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100314700

Congratulations 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

Hi, what street level imagery was used for this?
Thanks,
ortho_is_hot

Whoops sorry about that thanks for correcting, I think the boundaries should be separate ways anyway but cool

Hi, as the upgrade has progressed they've been swapping the alignment to either side; in this case they've finished the new section on the eastern side so two way traffic is using that and they're upgrading the western side which is the original alignment, which is why I marked it as construction? Thanks, ortho_is_hot

Hi, what street level imagery was used for this? Thanks, ortho_is_hot

Hi, just a follow up to the above?

Hi, what streetlevel imagery are you using for this since it's in the source?
Thanks, ortho_is_hot

Comment should've said: Reverted changesets 98442510 and 98442734 as a separate way is not needed for contraflow lanes (JOSM seems to have had an error)

Hi, I've restored the runway area for Broome (in 98480589) as area:aeroway=runway.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, I've restored one of the waterbodies that you deleted as based on Maxar Premium (the imagery that the original editor used, as well as the one that appears to be most up to date) this water source still exists (changeset 98480045)

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, I've just shifted back the crossing at Glenayr Avenue since the imagery is a bit out of date and they've relocated the crossing a bit to the south (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/874056066)

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97151052

Cheers, thanks for the quick response

Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97027324