ortho_is_hot's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
97019269 | over 4 years ago | Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97027324 |
97019490 | over 4 years ago | Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97027324 |
97019860 | over 4 years ago | Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97027324 |
97019976 | over 4 years ago | Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97027324 |
97020125 | over 4 years ago | Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97027324 |
97009491 | over 4 years ago | Your vandalism has been reverted osm.org/changeset/97010017 |
96751340 | over 4 years ago | Hi there, I've changed osm.org/relation/1388318 back to a natural=wood (in osm.org/changeset/96757738) instead of a campground as it is a large polygon as part of the forest and national park. Cheers,
|
96514481 | over 4 years ago | G'day MarkusNC, I've reverted these changes in osm.org/changeset/96543332 Unless something has changed within the past month, I recall that both of these roads are accessible to vehicles (not bicycle only). It could be possible that at least parts of them are oneway however recent LPI imagery (as well as my own recollections) suggest that they aren't. If I am incorrect please do let me know. Cheers,
|
96351865 | over 4 years ago | G'day mjs24, and welcome to OSM, I've reverted this change (osm.org/changeset/96352770) since the access=no key prevents all modes of transport, but there were additional keys to allow certain types of modes along the road (e.g. bus=designated allows buses to use the road) since sub-keys override the access key. If you have any other questions please feel free the reach out. Cheers,
|
95399132 | over 4 years ago | Link should actually be https://client.damn-project.org/?area=2230&square=227 |
95328899 | over 4 years ago | G'day, contributions are looking good; just a suggestion it's helpful to other mappers to include a source in the changeset e.g. aerial imagery, local knowledge etc Cheers,
|
92799358 | over 4 years ago | Hi, the signage on the ground (2020 survey) and website https://www.mcdonaldjoneshomes.com.au/house-and-land-packages/newcastle-hunter/lochinvar/st-helena-estate all have the village in smaller writing underneath. You could argue its not technically the name, which was why I added it as an alternative name. Cheers,
|
95152448 | over 4 years ago | Hi there, the way you mapped it later on with the cycleway way was the best way to map it imo. Cheers,
|
95150832 | over 4 years ago | Hi there mitchelldm, and welcome to OSM, From memory halfway down the laneway it has an end shared zone just after the access road for the apartment garages in which case it reverts to residential? Cheers,
|
94800834 | over 4 years ago | Hi, with osm.org/edit#map=20/-33.78197/150.83813 the footways can't route with the roadway any more since they are now disconnected, and same for any other situations where this occurs. highway=service is the appropriate tagging for a residential driveway, is there any reason this was removed? Cheers,
|
94669943 | over 4 years ago | Hi there, if you are able to name the specific software that may be helpful, but regardless, my best assumption is that said software mustn't be respecting a lack of shared nodes. That is with most routers, if the roads are not connected at a node (point) then the router treats them so that it can't route between them. My best guess is that something like this is the case. |
94669943 | over 4 years ago | G'day, I've reverted this change (osm.org/changeset/94707615) since both roads are already separated as there were no shared nodes (aka no possible routing) and the bridge was already marked with layer=1. Is there a particular router that this is causing issues with? Cheers,
|
94629407 | over 4 years ago | G'day 2Woy, and welcome to OSM, Just with osm.org/way/876104295 highway=pedestrian is suited to wide areas open for pedestrians e.g. squares, plazas, which are closed to vehicles (see osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian). In my opinion a small cut-through like that would be more suited to a general footway (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway). Apart from the changeset looks good. Cheers,
|
94246173 | over 4 years ago | That could be the case; I'll review my dashcam later today and make adjustments to the motorway as necessary |
94246173 | over 4 years ago | In my opinion, yes they should both be reverted given its a major motorway, as well as in my opinion these aren't correct |