G'day Screwtapello,

What is the source for the addresses and building categories that you have added here? Just curious as iD gives an option to add a source (whether it be survey, aerial imagery, etc) and that isn't present in this changeset.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

G'day Evgin78, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm commenting because I noticed you requested a review of this changeset.

The parking aisle that you have added appears to be correct. If you *really* want to get into specifics, then the way between osm.org/node/6474307587 and osm.org/node/7056276349 is technically just a service road not a parking aisle, but it's really a minor thing anyway.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

G'day Evgin78, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm commenting because I noticed you requested a review of this changeset.

Your change of classification to these roads are correct, as the roads leading in do not provide direct access to parking spaces.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

G'day Evgin78, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm commenting because I noticed you requested a review of this changeset.

The classification of the roads you have made all appear to be correct. I see you've changed the two roads leading into the parking lot from a parking aisle to a generic service road in a later changeset, which is more correct.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Ah I see there is a relation also for each direction of services as well that I missed, thanks.

As for network, I think "Sydney Light Rail" because it's in line with the rest of the transport network (Sydney Buses, Sydney Trains, etc), it has a website called "Sydney light rail" (includes the L1 as well), and its own(ish) wikidata identifier (Q771666)

*eastbound NOT westbound

Updated in osm.org/changeset/77752703

Fair point, I'll go ahead and make that adjustment now. It seems that their main signage is present on Brighton Boulevard hence why they advertise that address but I see your point

I queried the address on sixmaps and it showed it as being "
27-29 HASTINGS PARADE NORTH BONDI"

Apologies for messing up the realtions-as far as I could tell, all of the administrative boundaries were closed when I was editing. I have fixed (as far as I can tell) the turn restrictions in changeset 77713074. Thanks for pointing out the issue.

How would you go about specifying that other road users can't use the lane? I checked taginfo and agree that psv:lanes and the like have more total uses than access:lanes, so its the more agreed upon option

Sorry, that was a typo. I've fixed it now, thanks for pointing that error out

Yeah, I noticed the activity on that changeset. I just couldn't leave the comments blank. Perhaps if the user contributes in the future, I'm not sure.

G'day PegahMir,

In regards to your recent contributions—all of your changeset comments are "Some changes have been made" which isn't particularly helpful to other mappers when reviewing object history. It would be appreciated if your comments could specify what you have changed, for example "Removed plumber from Canada Building and created a separate node for the plumber"

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

I'll admit, I was expecting you to say something like that. Although you are spot on—iD doesn't recognise this tag yet for whatever reason.

Might have to put a GH issue to add this as a feature.

My thought process was that with a lot of different relations around here it would be beneficial to have "Destination sign to xyz" show up rather than relation 12345, in iD at least. Although granted, they don't specifically need a name

No worries! Good to see this sort of navigation data being added

In regards to the destination_sign relation, that is the same way that I have been doing it an osmose has not reported any errors so far. Looks good

It seems that operator:abn has 25 uses all in Australia. Maybe that's a better tag? I can't see operator:ref:abn in taginfo.

G'day,
I have reverted some of your contributions to The Bucket List in a new changeset (osm.org/changeset/75186250). If you have any questions of contentions please reach out.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot