Thanks! I plan to add more detail like this unless there are any objections ;)

From what I can tell, the change has made it so that the offramp connects closer to the tunnel entry instead of continuing on to only exit at the offramp, which is the opposite of the case in real life, the single lane is only meant to exit on KGR.

Sorry my mistake, I was a block off. I'll revert my changes, thanks for pointing that one out

Surveyed on 2020-11-10, the road is now connected (the roundabout has become a signalised intersection) so I've gone ahead and updated it osm.org/changeset/94093451

My best guess is that there is some form of ongoing construction or they need some sort of approval before they remove the signage. Given that there is signage I would think that its still a no go for a while

Hi, has this road opened yet?

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

Whoops, thanks for fixing that

Thanks for the correction, looks good

This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts

This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts

This changeset has been reverted in 93477679 with the comment:

Reverted changesets 93352056, 93352132, and 93352799: bus lanes that are not physically separated from the rest of the road don't need to be separate roads, also restored lane counts

Hi there, I would suggest using the DCS Imagery (should be at the top of the background list on the right) as it is higher quality compared to Bing. Also, to ensure that building outlines have 90 degree angles, you can use the orthagonalize tool, which is accessed with the "Q" key in iD

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

No worries, thanks for clarifying

Hi, the onramp curve looks good however my own as well as the existing GPS data agrees more with the motorway being closer to where it was before?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, is osm.org/way/714727382/history not a driveway or access road for the car dealership?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, osm.org/way/865779413 has the building=yes tag but from what I can see it's only the grass outline?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, if this building is ancillary to the main building then it shouldn't have any place of worship tagging as it implies that there are two churches here, not one.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, this petrol station is already mapped as a node here, so a choice needs to be made about whether to represent the station as an outline or as a node (osm.org/node/1836362663). Duplicating features isn't correct practice.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, its good practice in OSM to leave changeset comments rather than nothing as it makes it easier for other mappers to tell what you have done. e.g. "added grass and footpath near Minchin Drive" is better than "."

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, for small walkways such as osm.org/way/865773725/history it's best to be mapped as a footway rather than a pedestrian street (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot