OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
159708632 8 months ago

See osm.org/changeset/159708327

159708327 8 months ago

After reading osm.wiki/Tag:access%253Dprivate, I realized that access=private was not the appropriate tag for the private roads in changesets 159706963, 159707415, and 159707850. While they are privately owned, roads like this typically have easements that allow certain use by others. I have not researched the easements, so I chose to remove the access tag rather than use access=permissive or similar.

154055935 about 1 year ago

Announcement of annexation on 2024-05-20: https://www.townofwoodway.com/your_government/building_and_planning/point_wells.php

153249655 about 1 year ago

Questionable that this route should even exist in OSM. I've ridden parts of it and don't remember seeing any signs for it.

150570543 over 1 year ago

See osm.org/changeset/149966205

149966205 over 1 year ago

This also introduced a couple gaps in the bike route relations involving these streets. I fixed them in osm.org/changeset/150570543

145683145 over 1 year ago

Permissive sounds reasonable to me. The easement is technically only for the "adjoining property owners" (see King County Recording #19990701001281), but if they allow others to walk through then permissive would be more accurate.

148805345 over 1 year ago

The divided median has a cut here to facilitate crossing. There are no signs prohibiting crossing between the east side of 3rd Ave NE and the west side of NE Serpentine Pl, only on the west side of 3rd Ave NE and the east side of NE Serpentine Pl.

148575638 over 1 year ago

I intentionally disconnected KC Metro Routes 892, 891, and 216 in this changeset. Those routes were discontinued, so I removed them in changesets 148575909, 148576018, and 148576287.

146573630 over 1 year ago

I checked the Latah County parcel information, and this portion of the trail/railroad ROW is all owned by Latah County.

144879408 over 1 year ago

Upon further review, I think changesets 144879254 and 144879408 should be reverted.

Your earlier changes where you removed the bicycle=yes tag and Palouse to Cascades Trail relation are perfectly valid. These two changes (144879254/144879408), where you deleted the abandoned railroad and parts of several nearby roads, are not.

In your comments on changeset 144808909, you mentioned that you were concerned about people mapping routes along the abandoned railroad on Strava, Garmin, and similar tools. By removing the highway=track and bicycle=yes tags, removing the cycle route relation, and updating the access tag, you had already achieved this. There was no need to delete the abandoned railroad entirely.

145456007 over 1 year ago

Note that the sign does not limit the restriction to school days. It just says 7am-5pm.

144879408 over 1 year ago

In this changeset, you disconnected South Cove Road from Idaho Road (the southern portion leading to Willard). Was that intentional or a mistake?

144078006 over 1 year ago

The signs don't indicate where one greenway ends and the other begins, so I picked Delridge Way SW as the boundary since that's the road these greenways flank.

143924221 over 1 year ago

I meant Bothell, not Kenmore

142323281 almost 2 years ago

I merged the two in osm.org/changeset/142337197. Let me know if that looks better.

I originally mapped it as a separate camp_site because the entrance to the hiker/biker sites is off the day use area rather than the main campground area. Either way is fine by me, though.

140355962 almost 2 years ago

The path between the end of 28th Ave S and the I-90 Trail is paved and open to the public. I reverted the changes to that path in osm.org/changeset/140745936

124844570 almost 3 years ago

Thanks for the explanation! I updated it to cycleway=track in osm.org/changeset/124870787 (except for the areas where the bollards disappear by intersections).

122933168 about 3 years ago

Thanks for responding. This is a problem with the applications, not with the map data. This situation is documented on the wiki here: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

You're right that many applications don't distinguish paths with the access=no tag. Here is an example of one such path: osm.org/way/503291111 (more: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jNP). openstreetmap.org and OsmAnd distinguish private paths for some but not all map styles. Komoot does not distinguish private paths. I will file bugs against those projects/map styles.

122933168 about 3 years ago

I will not re-add it, but this path should not have been deleted. It physically exists. The access=no tag can be used to indicate that access to a trail is prohibited.