See osm.org/note/4664278

I noticed that the street running between West Morris Boulevard and Morris Boulevard is referred to as Kitson Street in the county assessor records, but in this changeset it was renamed to Kitsap Street. Do you happen to remember why it was renamed?

Per osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway, roads shouldn't be mapped as a dual carriageway if there's no barrier. This road used to have a barrier, but now just has a painted centerline.

Bus layover area will need to be aligned with aerial imagery once available. King County will likely release new imagery this summer.

It looks like the "highway" tag was accidentally removed in osm.org/changeset/161822967

I went ahead and marked the last bit of the desire path as private (osm.org/changeset/161551794), since I do remember seeing the no transit center access sign on 60th Ave W.

As of two months ago, there was a gap in the fence next to the fire hydrant. Is that no longer the case?

I'm not sure the name Salish Fjord is actually in common use. As far as I can tell, it was just one person campaigning to change the name. I'm not local to the area though, so I won't remove it myself.

A duplicate feature for the Hood Canal was added in changeset 1275928557. The changeset comment indicates it was done to add an alternate name for the Hood Canal, the Salish Fjord. In this changeset, I deleted the redundant feature and added that name as an alt_name for the Hood Canal relation.

Note that the name "Salish Fjord" was rejected by the Washington State Committee on Geographic Names. The meeting minutes are available here: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/bc_geog_12112023_minutes.pdf (2023-12-11).

More information about the project: https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/pedestrian-program/pinehurst-way-ne-and-ne-117th-st-intersection-and-sidewalk-project

See osm.org/changeset/159708327

After reading osm.wiki/Tag:access%253Dprivate, I realized that access=private was not the appropriate tag for the private roads in changesets 159706963, 159707415, and 159707850. While they are privately owned, roads like this typically have easements that allow certain use by others. I have not researched the easements, so I chose to remove the access tag rather than use access=permissive or similar.

Announcement of annexation on 2024-05-20: https://www.townofwoodway.com/your_government/building_and_planning/point_wells.php

Questionable that this route should even exist in OSM. I've ridden parts of it and don't remember seeing any signs for it.

See osm.org/changeset/149966205

This also introduced a couple gaps in the bike route relations involving these streets. I fixed them in osm.org/changeset/150570543

Permissive sounds reasonable to me. The easement is technically only for the "adjoining property owners" (see King County Recording #19990701001281), but if they allow others to walk through then permissive would be more accurate.

The divided median has a cut here to facilitate crossing. There are no signs prohibiting crossing between the east side of 3rd Ave NE and the west side of NE Serpentine Pl, only on the west side of 3rd Ave NE and the east side of NE Serpentine Pl.

I intentionally disconnected KC Metro Routes 892, 891, and 216 in this changeset. Those routes were discontinued, so I removed them in changesets 148575909, 148576018, and 148576287.

I checked the Latah County parcel information, and this portion of the trail/railroad ROW is all owned by Latah County.