OpenStreetMap логотипі OpenStreetMap

Changeset Қашан Пікір
44117913 5 ай бұрын

Shop sells cookers (gas and electric), fridges, washing machines and TVs.

Re-tag as you see fit.

161977058 7 ай бұрын

Thank you; conformed on website. Updated to "disused"

161864786 7 ай бұрын

Because they have different metadata. The organisation is not listed; the website does not represent the building; there are two Wikidata items; etc.

141319176 2 жыл бұрын дерлік

Thank you

136712729 шамамен 2 жыл бұрын

Noted.

However, OSIP is not available to me (per wiki: "[OSIP] uses a server that is known to block HTTPS connections from outside the United States.")

The alignment of the Maxar imagery which I used was congruent with exiting roads and buildings in the vicinity.

AIUI, it's acceptable to map buildings as rectangles (or other reasonable approximations) when exact shapes cannot be determined.

128746376 3 жыл бұрын дерлік

Is there really an acute angle at the rear? Not a straight wall, albeit narrow?

If really correct, it can be marked as "not an issue" on maproulette

87533706 шамамен 5 жыл бұрын

Has that been agred as standard? It was still being debated, last time I looked.

56092104 over 7 years ago

P.S. ...or someone else did.

56092104 over 7 years ago

Doh, I was looking for that, couldn't find it, and then saw the junk. I went to revet, but its seems you have already restored the buoy.

52424928 8 жыл бұрын дерлік

Also, I'm sorry to hear of your experience editing around London; that is equally unacceptable.

52424928 8 жыл бұрын дерлік

" if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve?"

That case is false, so your question is moot.

52424928 8 жыл бұрын дерлік

I'm not sure what you mean by "empowered by Wikidata", and the fact that I am from England does not prohibit me from editing an item in Germany, a country I have visited - and shopped in - often, so please tone down the frankly unacceptable nationalist rhetoric.

As to a "common brand", I note that the shared website https://www.aldi.com/ caries the logo of both companies.

46819034 over 8 years ago

Other issues are already being discussed elsewhere, but "Betula sp" (strictly, with italicised "Betula" and period in "sp.") is the correct taxonomic designation for a specimen of the genus Betula, whose exact species is not known.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Abbreviations