Et Logo vun OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
44117913 5 months ago

Shop sells cookers (gas and electric), fridges, washing machines and TVs.

Re-tag as you see fit.

161977058 7 months ago

Thank you; conformed on website. Updated to "disused"

161864786 7 months ago

Because they have different metadata. The organisation is not listed; the website does not represent the building; there are two Wikidata items; etc.

141319176 almost 2 years ago

Thank you

136712729 about 2 years ago

Noted.

However, OSIP is not available to me (per wiki: "[OSIP] uses a server that is known to block HTTPS connections from outside the United States.")

The alignment of the Maxar imagery which I used was congruent with exiting roads and buildings in the vicinity.

AIUI, it's acceptable to map buildings as rectangles (or other reasonable approximations) when exact shapes cannot be determined.

128746376 almost 3 years ago

Is there really an acute angle at the rear? Not a straight wall, albeit narrow?

If really correct, it can be marked as "not an issue" on maproulette

87533706 about 5 years ago

Has that been agred as standard? It was still being debated, last time I looked.

56092104 over 7 years ago

P.S. ...or someone else did.

56092104 over 7 years ago

Doh, I was looking for that, couldn't find it, and then saw the junk. I went to revet, but its seems you have already restored the buoy.

52424928 almost 8 years ago

Also, I'm sorry to hear of your experience editing around London; that is equally unacceptable.

52424928 almost 8 years ago

" if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve?"

That case is false, so your question is moot.

52424928 almost 8 years ago

I'm not sure what you mean by "empowered by Wikidata", and the fact that I am from England does not prohibit me from editing an item in Germany, a country I have visited - and shopped in - often, so please tone down the frankly unacceptable nationalist rhetoric.

As to a "common brand", I note that the shared website https://www.aldi.com/ caries the logo of both companies.

46819034 over 8 years ago

Other issues are already being discussed elsewhere, but "Betula sp" (strictly, with italicised "Betula" and period in "sp.") is the correct taxonomic designation for a specimen of the genus Betula, whose exact species is not known.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Abbreviations