OpenStreetMap
rumbrummers Blogeintrag-Kommentare
| Änderungssatz | Zeitpunkt | Kommentar |
|---|---|---|
| 167058612 | vor 2 Monaten | Sorry, comment is confusing, should be swing gates, not lift gates. |
| 159129827 | vor 4 Monaten | Hi, laut Kurviger Forum ist die Straße noch in Bau:
|
| 161297924 | vor 7 Monaten | tagging with access=cutomers is ok - but it takes a few days until Kurviger takes it over (please see Kurviger forum: https://forum.kurviger.com/t/ferry-crossing-troon-brodick-arran-is-missing/20151/6 |
| 140946791 | vor 11 Monaten | Thanks for feedback. I put a hint for clarification in OSM:
|
| 140946791 | vor 11 Monaten | Is that road really one way? I am not sure, but did not see a sign. |
| 155593158 | vor 12 Monaten | The obsolete restriction I mean is osm.org/relation/17960948 |
| 155593158 | vor 12 Monaten | From my point of view this restriction is obsolete, because osm.org/way/23221922 is tagged as onway, and turning left would mean driving in wrong direction of oneway |
| 145579837 | vor 12 Monaten | I removed one of them, please see osm.org/changeset/155620637 |
| 145579837 | vor 12 Monaten | Thanks for the fast change - the "straight on forbidden" restriction is gone, Kurviger updates OSM changes to its routing machine each 2 days - I will check ASAP. But the buggy restrictions (way instead of node as via) are still there - I am afraid that they will not work properly in routing machines, but I am not an expert. |
| 145579837 | vor 12 Monaten | Are you sure with
|
| 138573601 | vor etwa 2 Jahren | Hi,
|
| 133859684 | vor etwa 2 Jahren | Thanks for feedback - done! |
| 133859684 | vor etwa 2 Jahren | Ah - got it: In the past there have been 3 nodes: The saddle 10221246496 (20m besides the road), a pass 10598911072 20m away from that saddle (in the road) and an other pass ~200m away in the road (I did not see it).
|
| 133859684 | vor etwa 2 Jahren | Hi, thanks for the hint, but yes, I am aware of that (and was also before ;-) ): As you can see in history osm.org/node/10221246496/history, in this case the old pass position was 20m away from saddle position.
If you open the node in edit mode and use the OpenTopoMap, you can see the old pass position - it is 20m away from the road (can not paste screenshot here) - if you shift it to the road, you reach the saddle position. So I do not understand why this change (shift pass onto road, unify it with saddle node) should be wrong - every hint mentioned above says that pass and saddle are at same position. I unified several pass/saddle pairs which had a very low distance to a single node - it is not useful to have separate pass and saddle close together, because that causes poor readability in some OSM maps. If I did a mistake and unified a pair, which was not close together, please give a feedback, I will revert it. Regards |
| 135395751 | vor über 2 Jahren | Ich habe 2 Hinweise angelegt, die kannst Du über das Ebenen-Menu auf der rechten Seite einblenden.
osm.org/changeset/135395751#map=19/48.14567/11.57484&layers=N |
| 135395751 | vor über 2 Jahren | Du hast das "lanes" tag und das "oneway" tag entfernt - ich denke, das wird das Problem nicht lösen, sondern verschlimmern (jetzt kann auch in Gegenrichtung über den Weg geroutet werden).
|
| 133688562 | vor über 2 Jahren | Der Pass
|
| 118292982 | vor über 2 Jahren | Is access=no correct for this lane of N20? |
| 116196102 | vor etwa 3 Jahren | Hi, as mentionede in the comment of the changes, I just put the mountain pass onto the road (the elevation was already there, please see osm.org/node/6333378176/history ). So your information probably is correct. |
| 116187585 | vor über 3 Jahren | Thanks for the feedback. I have modified several mountain passes (with iD) - unfortunately many times with lost history.
|