Sorry, comment is confusing, should be swing gates, not lift gates.

Hi, laut Kurviger Forum ist die Straße noch in Bau:
https://forum.kurviger.com/t/baustelle-in-osm-wird-aber-nicht-in-kurviger-angezeigt/21481
-> ich würde sie als "construction" taggen.
Warum hast Du sie zurückgedreht?

tagging with access=cutomers is ok - but it takes a few days until Kurviger takes it over (please see Kurviger forum: https://forum.kurviger.com/t/ferry-crossing-troon-brodick-arran-is-missing/20151/6

Thanks for feedback. I put a hint for clarification in OSM:
osm.org/note/4455529#map=16/44.05110/3.54528&layers=N

Is that road really one way? I am not sure, but did not see a sign.

The obsolete restriction I mean is osm.org/relation/17960948

From my point of view this restriction is obsolete, because osm.org/way/23221922 is tagged as onway, and turning left would mean driving in wrong direction of oneway

I removed one of them, please see osm.org/changeset/155620637

Thanks for the fast change - the "straight on forbidden" restriction is gone, Kurviger updates OSM changes to its routing machine each 2 days - I will check ASAP. But the buggy restrictions (way instead of node as via) are still there - I am afraid that they will not work properly in routing machines, but I am not an expert.

Are you sure with
osm.org/relation/16887214
? I think this forbids jus driving the main road. Please see https://kurv.gr/82eS4 as example.
Furthermore restrictions
osm.org/relation/16887211
and
osm.org/relation/16887213
seem to be buggy: Via should be a node, not a way.

Hi,
you deleted also the saddle osm.org/node/3269588212 - was this intended ?
Regards

Thanks for feedback - done!

Ah - got it: In the past there have been 3 nodes: The saddle 10221246496 (20m besides the road), a pass 10598911072 20m away from that saddle (in the road) and an other pass ~200m away in the road (I did not see it).
I unified the two nodes which were close together. So, as far as I understand, I should move the modified node to the old position of 10221246496 (and remove node from road) and remove the mountain_pass tag, because real pass is ~200m north, right?
I would appreciate if you could confirm (I want to avoid further chaos :-) ).

Hi,

thanks for the hint, but yes, I am aware of that (and was also before ;-) ):

As you can see in history osm.org/node/10221246496/history, in this case the old pass position was 20m away from saddle position.
Furthermore the saddle position was on the road - so I unified them to one node. The position of the unified node is the position of the old saddle node (deleted).

If you open the node in edit mode and use the OpenTopoMap, you can see the old pass position - it is 20m away from the road (can not paste screenshot here) - if you shift it to the road, you reach the saddle position.

So I do not understand why this change (shift pass onto road, unify it with saddle node) should be wrong - every hint mentioned above says that pass and saddle are at same position.

I unified several pass/saddle pairs which had a very low distance to a single node - it is not useful to have separate pass and saddle close together, because that causes poor readability in some OSM maps.

If I did a mistake and unified a pair, which was not close together, please give a feedback, I will revert it.

Regards

Ich habe 2 Hinweise angelegt, die kannst Du über das Ebenen-Menu auf der rechten Seite einblenden.
Bei Fragen / Hinweisen kannst Du über den Knopf auf der rechten Seite (Sprechblase und "+") solche Hinweise anlegen, die dann ein Mapper vor Ort prüfen kann.

osm.org/changeset/135395751#map=19/48.14567/11.57484&layers=N

Du hast das "lanes" tag und das "oneway" tag entfernt - ich denke, das wird das Problem nicht lösen, sondern verschlimmern (jetzt kann auch in Gegenrichtung über den Weg geroutet werden).
Wenn die Querverbindung nicht (mehr?) existiert, kannst Du die beiden Segmente löschen.

Der Pass
osm.org/node/224417857
ist jetzt Teil der Straße - war vorher alleinstehend. Nachdem ich ihn in die Straße gezogen habe, hatte er auch die Tags für den Fußgängerüberweg. Da dort kein Überweg ist (siehe Mapillary) und sich keine Fusswege anschliessen, habe ich die Fußgängerüberweg-Tags entfernt

Is access=no correct for this lane of N20?

Hi, as mentionede in the comment of the changes, I just put the mountain pass onto the road (the elevation was already there, please see osm.org/node/6333378176/history ). So your information probably is correct.

Thanks for the feedback. I have modified several mountain passes (with iD) - unfortunately many times with lost history.
I will try if I can revert it with level0-Editor as described in osm.wiki/Level0