Just a quick post here:
Maning Sambale already posted about the meta data added by Los Angeles Building Import. We’ve imported more than 1.2 million buildings and we were flattered to talk about our work at last weekend’s State of the Map. You can see our slides here.
But what I find particularly interesting is how this building data stacks up against other city imports. These maps show any polygon tagged as building=value. Feedback welcome.
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Glassman ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2016 at 05:50 ߘߐ߫
Jon, Sorry I missed your talk. Can’t wait to see the video.
The Latest LA data looks very rich. Do you have a breakdown of building=*?
Clifford
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Chetan_Gowda ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2016 at 12:06 ߘߐ߫
This is amazing!! @schleuss
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ saikabhi ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2016 at 12:11 ߘߐ߫
This is incredible @schleuss! Just showed how much more valuable was added to OSM during the LA building import.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ redsteakraw ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2016 at 12:21 ߘߐ߫
I would love if you did this for New Haven, it has nearly 100% building coverage non import pure community effort.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ nmixter ߟߊ߫ 29 July 2016 at 00:51 ߘߐ߫
Great job! Maybe someday every building from San Francisco to L.A. will be in OSM. Let’s do San Jose next.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ schleuss ߟߊ߫ 30 July 2016 at 18:08 ߘߐ߫
@Glassman
Thanks! I do have a breakdown somewhere. Let em see if I can dig it up.
@redsteakraw I’ll look at it. And I should probably make a post describing how to do it.
Thanks all!
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ ediyes ߟߊ߫ 4 August 2016 at 15:04 ߘߐ߫
Awesome work !!