soshial's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
152215420 | 16 days ago | Reverted sac_scale to T2, because I didn't notice anything challenging (not a single time had to help balance with hands) on the route to Ceska koca. |
168900146 | 17 days ago | Here are the examples of geojson files for Italy: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/tree/gh-pages/sources/europe/it Here's an example for WMS: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/blob/gh-pages/sources/europe/it/Lombardia-Italy-CTR.geojson?short_path=feaf137 Here's the tutorial: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md |
168900146 | 17 days ago | I wasn't aware of the orthophotos, because those are probably not available in the official layer index: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index
I aligned the tracks with my GPS recording. I will fix the hiking relation in a sec |
162545289 | 6 months ago | Also, the hike starts from the centre of Lokavec. There are markings on the parking there. |
158262565 | 8 months ago | This cycleway is separated by green hedge (bushes) osm.org/way/1310997762. This way osm.org/way/1327574306 is separated from footway by row of trees. I will fix the rest |
155725056 | 8 months ago | Hi Martin! Thank you for your concern, I do know about this rule. If you check out those cycleways, those are separated by bushes/small greenery. Hence those are mapped accordingly :) |
147320629 | 11 months ago | This road is definitely not aspahalt, but gravel: osm.org/way/412115315 |
108275722 | 11 months ago | Hey, I recorded my GPS route during flying with the zipline and I've mapped the whole thing. Thanks for your initial effort! It has only passed 3 years 😆 |
155066277 | 12 months ago | Reverting an edit conflict |
155065899 | 12 months ago | Reverting an edit conflict |
125397061 | about 1 year ago | Got it. Please, tag me under your changset if you do it. Or, if you change your mind, I will add it myself. Take care and thanks a lot! |
125397061 | about 1 year ago | Do you mind if I remove those path names and add them into hiking path relation? |
85995165 | about 1 year ago | I wonder why you did put access=no for all these footpaths around here... Hmm. For example: osm.org/way/546836024 |
137830211 | about 1 year ago | Thank you so much for adding this bicycle route of Vrhnika! |
151617561 | about 1 year ago | Thank you so much for adding this hiking route: osm.org/relation/17618381. I hiked it today and it was beautiful. Do you know what was the route that was marked with red sun on yellow background? |
128738333 | over 1 year ago | OK, thanks. I resolved that and added other neighbourhoods as subareas to the Vrhnika town. |
128738333 | over 1 year ago | Hey Martin. I realized that you added this residential area with a name a year before I added neighbourhood point here. I was thinking that maybe this name "Janezova vas" probably belongs to the neighborhood more than the residential area, that could be several inside neoghbourhood... What do you think about having a neighbourhood relation like this: osm.org/changeset/149243221 |
127449750 | about 2 years ago | Hey! I don't know any official sources either, but we simply call this hill like this. The hill is an attraction I'd say, since it really stands out. |
125864070 | about 2 years ago | Liels paldies! |
123948963 | about 3 years ago | This change, which added an address as a housename "Riepu serviss" is a bit weird. Is it correct? osm.org/way/1080496873/history |