Thank you for replying and fixing that so quickly :)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your good work improving the map.

I notice the "opening_hours" on Royton Leisure Centre at osm.org/node/10622234073 looks like it's missing a "0" on the end: "08:00-17:0" probably should be "08:00-17:00" but let me know if I've jumped to the wrong conclusion.

Thank you for confirming: Web sites often contain outdated or incorrect information, so I'm sure that what you surveyed in person will be more accurate.

Thank you for fixing this and for all your good work improving the map.

Are you sure the cafe opens at 6am as tagged in "opening_hours" on osm.org/node/4560935418? Its Web site at https://www.lu-ma.co.uk/ suggests it opens at 8am.

You have tagged Park Lane with "sidewalk=both" in this change, but for most, perhaps all, its length "sidewalk=none" seems more accurate.

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

Generally we use the acronym "FHRS" to refer to food hygeine ratings on OpenStreetMap, not FSA. It took me a while to realise what "FSA" means in your changeset description and "source" tag.

The most commonly used tagging is "source=FHRS Open Data": https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/source=FHRS%20Open%20Data#overview

Thank you for your continued good work on the map.

When you add sidewalks to the map, as you have done here for osm.org/way/1183348775 please also tag the corresponding road, in this case osm.org/way/383746184 (Wool Road), to state that its sidewalks are mapped separately as described at osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way to help pedestrian routing tools.

Thank you: I'm glad to hear you will continue making the map better - you've already done a lot of useful work.

Thank you for fixing this.

I recently noticed obsolete railway information disrupting Nominatim results and fixed some of these near where I live. I really appreciate your diligent work doing the same across the country.

Thank you for responding and editing that so quickly.

If you think "Cultural Quarter" is used commonly enough you could add it as a "loc_name": osm.wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)

Currently, a Nominatim search doesn't match anything for "Cultural Quarter, Oldham" osm.org/search?query=cultural+quarter%252C+oldham but adding it as a loc_name would fix that.

When you add pavements, such as osm.org/way/1337412668, it would be very helpful if you would also add "sidewalk=separate" (or better "sidewalk:both=separate") to the corresponding road, in this case osm.org/way/63126314

Please see osm.wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks or ask if you have any questions.

Hi, thank you for your helpful work improving OpenStreetMap.

I notice you tagged a building as "Gallery Oldham", which makes sense as the gallery exists in this building. However, the building is also used as a library.

Both these facilities exist as osm.org/node/10022209197 and osm.org/node/12312824270.

In the spirit of osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I suggest removing the name from osm.org/way/1094285094 - does this sound like a good idea to you?

I have made this change in osm.org/changeset/165881684

Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

This change names both the farmyard and farmhouse as both "Study Farm" which seems a bit awkward.

I suspect it would be slightly better to use "addr:housename" instead of "name" to tag the farm house. What do you think?

Thank you for all the helpful information and fixing the misshaped buildings.

Your description of the street's addresses suggests osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#addr:substreet,_addr:street_&_addr:parentstreet might help tag them better.

Thank you for adding details to the map.

What does it mean for osm.org/node/1246881721 to have both "step_count=1" and "steps=2"?

This changeset adds the "step_count" tag to a stile that already has "steps" specified.

Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

I notice you have tagged the service road at osm.org/way/1222211042 as "access=customers" but the car park that it forms part of at osm.org/way/768586253 has very few tags.

It would be helpful to add more descriptive tags such as "access" to the car park itself.

Again, thank you for your good work.

Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

I notice you have mapped a row of houses to the east of Kinder View: osm.org/way/46773347

These houses all have addr:housename of "Kinder View" where I expect they should have addr:street instead. Is this a mistake?

Also numbers 3 and 4 at osm.org/way/1310648334 and osm.org/way/1310648307 are triangular, which also looks like a mistake.

This is not how addresses work in Manchester. Unfortunately Merzof never engages in changeset discussions: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8571542

I see no evidence that you have understood or fixed the problem I described.

I strongly encourage Meta / Facebook to stop clumsily editing the map in parts of the word that you have no knowledge of and do not understand.

I will tidy up the mess you made myself in due course.