OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
29910925 about 10 years ago

Hi
Looking at the imagery, I don't think Manor Drive and the footpath are connected. There looks like a barrier there, the problem that did need fixing was to connect the path to Dog Lane.

32637295 about 10 years ago

Hi
I have fixed your changes, there are clearly not going to be 3 ways into a car park so close together, the barrier can be seen on bing imagery and the lines give a clue to the traffic flow through the car park.

32543991 about 10 years ago

Are you sure this is the name of the summit?
Bwlch is a very odd name for a summit and it appears to be taken from the road in the, well bwlch, below.

32031539 about 10 years ago

You are not restricted to what iD offers in its dropdown, You can type in anything you like.
However if you start typing "de", then the option dentist appears.

32490706 about 10 years ago

Hi, I suspect this should be tagged as access=private, it doesn't look like a place anybody can visit.

32205622 about 10 years ago

Hey, you seem to have moved the cyclelane to the right hand side of the road, even though it is clearly visible on the left on bing. Remember we drive on the left and a cycle lane on the right would be very dangerous.

32212263 about 10 years ago

Hi again.
You seem to have disconnected footway osm.org/way/356357160 from the road, is there any reason for doing this? as you have left it it prevents use of the path for routing.
Cheers Phil

32212076 about 10 years ago

Hi
I am not sure how well you know Shrewsbury or when you , but Emstry Island was remodeled about 6 months ago. It no longer looks like bing imagery. There are a couple of recent traces on mapillary which show how it now looks.
When remote mapping, it is useful to compare the date of the bing imagery with the dates of the on the ground edits, especially when made by local mappers.
I am reverting this edit as it does not match the current on the ground layout.

32159105 about 10 years ago

Please spit your edits into sensible size areas.
Vast areas, such as this, make review of your changes by local mappers very difficult and make it look like you are trying to hide something.
Thanks

32094975 about 10 years ago

I have reverted this, you had deleted a park and re-added it less much detail which our volunteers had worked on.
Please remember that this is a live map, and is visible to everyone and is not a private map or a marketing tool.
If you need a customised map you could try http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

32072897 about 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the source of this name, I cannot see it on the map you claim as the source.
Also looking at bing imagery it doesn't look like it is at the highest point, 2 1/2 inch mapping is a useful source, but it cannot provide the positional accuracy of standing there with a GPS.
The old map actually shows a trigpoint rather than a peak, trigpoint are not necessarily on a peak, and does it still exist, I cannot see it on bing imagery and you often can.
Remember we are here to help, we are a community and that works best with goog communication.
Thanks Phil

32031539 about 10 years ago

Hi
This should have the tag amenity=dentist, then the name should be what is on the sign, probably name="Saving Faces"

32004182 about 10 years ago

What is there now?
Has a building or wall been put there or are there bollards allowing pedestrians/cyclists through?

31906395 about 10 years ago

This looks like some sort of personal route, please remember that osm is public and personal data has no place on the map.

31868655 about 10 years ago

Hi Craig
What is the source of these additions?
Do they exist on the ground?

31809483 about 10 years ago

Does this restaurant have a name?

31809530 about 10 years ago

Hi Manik
This should probably be tagged as shop=shoes as well.
Probably draw the building as shop=shoes and add the cafe node inside it.

31800311 about 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to osm.
The driveway should be tagged as private , not removed. The point where it joins the B4570 is a useful navigation point.

31761964 about 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your addition, however you seem to have deleted both Symons Hill and Glasney Road.
I have restored these, so the map is all good.
Keep on mapping and if you need any help, just ask.
Phil

31320434 about 10 years ago

I have reverted and fixed this one too, rather than delete the footpath it should have been connected to the A1014.