tyr_asd's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
45665399 | over 8 years ago | Hi. Die 15 war schon eingetragen: osm.org/node/2755987060. Bitte nicht mehrere Hausnummern (z.B. "15 und 15A") auf einem einzelnen Adresspunkt angeben. |
45345422 | over 8 years ago | I've fixed it. |
45571636 | over 8 years ago | Ok. Es könnte natürlich auch sein, dass die import-Daten fehlerhaft sind, aber das müsste man vor Ort herausfinden (und dann sowohl Straßennamen als auch Adressen in osm anpassen). Lg! |
45571636 | over 8 years ago | Stimmt die Schreibweise mit Bindestrich wirklich? Normalerweise würde man das ja zusammenschreiben (z.B. "Rohrerstraße") oder mit Leerzeichen trennen ("Rohrer Straße"). |
45364416 | over 8 years ago | Hi. Awesome to see the SI mapped here! But unfortunately, you somehow managed to break two large forest multipolygons (one is osm.org/relation/2794193) by removing the line osm.org/way/217836819 (which was used as an artificial split-line between the two forest polygons) from the multipolygon relations. Didn't you get a warning from JOSM that this line was part of relations? It would be nice if you could pay a little bit more attention next time. :) PS: I've already repaired the forests by now! |
45378730 | over 8 years ago | |
45378730 | over 8 years ago | source was osm.org/note/859488 |
45060415 | over 8 years ago | Thanks @sladen! |
45169141 | over 8 years ago | Hi. Thanks for the fixes. For your information: The user who contributed this erroneous data was more "active" in the vicinity (and elsewhere), making more problematic edits. I think I've reverted all the remaining problematic edits in the meantime. |
45167659 | over 8 years ago | Hi. Thanks for the fixes. For your information: The user who contributed this erroneous data was more "active" in the vicinity (and elsewhere). I think I've reverted all the remaining problematic edits in the meantime. |
45246084 | over 8 years ago | Hi. No worries! To your question: If you need a custom map style (e.g. one without road names), you should look at one of the many options to render your own map from OpenStreetMap data. Depending on what you need a map for, different tools or services can do the trick. For example "Maperitive" is relatively easy to use and produces static png maps as output, or you can look at what mapbox.com has to offer for your use-case. Here's a related page on the osm wiki with more information: osm.wiki/Rendering |
45246084 | over 8 years ago | Hi ET90! Why did you remove all these names from roads in the industrial area "Bolzano Sud"? It looks like a mistake to me. I will restore the names for now. Can you please explain what you wanted to do here? I think we can give you a helping hand. :) |
45310125 | over 8 years ago | Hi! Wieso hast du hier die ganzen Geschäfte/Lokale gelöscht? Wahrscheinlich ein Versehen, oder? Ich stelle die Objekte schnell wieder her. PS: Willkommen bei OSM! :) |
45184332 | over 8 years ago | Ich denke das ist ein Doppel-Account eines anderen Users der seit ein paar Wochen leider Probleme macht :( siehe osm.org/user_blocks/1150 |
45060415 | over 8 years ago | Hmm. Yes, but if I were the next editor, I wouldn't know how to use your data. In fact, it would possibly even hinder any further editing: for example, I wouldn't know if I can remove these lines that don't correspond to any actual feature on the ground or not. While I partially understand the motivation behind keeping the two circles (e.g. osm.org/way/464954584)*, for me it is totally unclear what the remaining lines are good for. For example: osm.org/way/465011450 or osm.org/way/464954580 – can you explain why we need those? If yes: at least, please add a note tag explaining how they are intended to be used by your fellow mappers. My point is that if only you know how to use it, that data is indistinguishable from garbage for everyone else. You can't compare that to OSM's GPS traces, where the functionality and intended usage is well documented. Thanks for understanding. :) * but even those could be redrawn very quickly by the next mapper in case they want to adjust the tracks while keeping the perfect round shape. |
45060415 | over 8 years ago | sorry, I don't get it. Why would it make sense to keep your "templates" in the DB? Couldn't you just store them in a local .osm file on your PC, if you need them again at some point in the future? |
10132292 | over 8 years ago | PS: You can see them on Osmose: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=5070&class=50703&zoom=10&lat=46.8249&lon=12.472&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT |
10132292 | over 8 years ago | Many of the housenames around here have invalid characters in them. Example: osm.org/way/136004208 |
23005970 | over 8 years ago | lol |
45012464 | over 8 years ago | OK, no problem! I've reverted this changeset now in osm.org/changeset/45055894. @Sentiero Italia: As the route is so long, it is mapped as several relations (one for each of the 368 "tappe", here's an example: osm.org/relation/2805907). See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Sentiero_Italia |