Hmm. Yes, but if I were the next editor, I wouldn't know how to use your data. In fact, it would possibly even hinder any further editing: for example, I wouldn't know if I can remove these lines that don't correspond to any actual feature on the ground or not.

While I partially understand the motivation behind keeping the two circles (e.g. osm.org/way/464954584)*, for me it is totally unclear what the remaining lines are good for. For example: osm.org/way/465011450 or osm.org/way/464954580 – can you explain why we need those? If yes: at least, please add a note tag explaining how they are intended to be used by your fellow mappers.

My point is that if only you know how to use it, that data is indistinguishable from garbage for everyone else. You can't compare that to OSM's GPS traces, where the functionality and intended usage is well documented. Thanks for understanding. :)

* but even those could be redrawn very quickly by the next mapper in case they want to adjust the tracks while keeping the perfect round shape.

sorry, I don't get it. Why would it make sense to keep your "templates" in the DB? Couldn't you just store them in a local .osm file on your PC, if you need them again at some point in the future?

PS: You can see them on Osmose: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=5070&class=50703&zoom=10&lat=46.8249&lon=12.472&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT

Many of the housenames around here have invalid characters in them. Example: osm.org/way/136004208

lol

OK, no problem! I've reverted this changeset now in osm.org/changeset/45055894.

@Sentiero Italia:

As the route is so long, it is mapped as several relations (one for each of the 368 "tappe", here's an example: osm.org/relation/2805907). See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Sentiero_Italia

PS: I've also restored this road, which was (I assume accidentally) deleted in this changeset: osm.org/way/288546535

Hi Gerd! Can you please explain what you tried to do in this changeset? For example, what is this line good for: osm.org/way/464613476 ?

nice work. thanks!

I've used "market:shop" for now, as I'm not aware of a better one.

Hi. This POI (and similar ones in the vicinity) is not an actual shop, but only a market stall (and only there for a couple of hours per week). Let's not tag them the same as regular shops.

@ZigiMigi1103: I've just reverted all your edits in this area, after talking to the operator of the skiing area. Your additions and deletions do not reflect the reality on the ground. For example, there is no Biathlon Center here, neither are there plans to construct one.

Please don't map stuff that doesn't exist in reality. Thank you.

I'm going to revert this changeset.

Why did you delete the large forest area here? :(

Hi Simon. Über https://osmlab.github.io/wikidata-osm/ habe ich einen Gipfel gefunden, wo die Wikipedia/Wikidata Einträge nicht zu den OMS-Daten passen: osm.org/node/852018589 (vergleiche z.B. die angegebene Meereshöhe und Koordinaten). Wie hast du denn hier die Einträge erfasst?

Ciao Luca. Tramite https://osmlab.github.io/wikidata-osm/, ho trovato (e già corretto) un errore: la pagina wikipedia "Rifugio Stella Alpina" si riferisce a quello nel val di Fassa, invece di quello al Lago Corvo. :)

Schade, dass du auf meine Frage nicht geantwortet hast. :(

Ich habe das Polygon jetzt aufgrund der oben genannten Mängel gelöscht.

Hi. Here, you draw some polygons, but did't put any tags on it: osm.org/way/460336616

What do they represent?

why did you delete a whole bunch of objects in this changeset? For example, some waterways and the nature-reserve area are now missing. Is this a mistake? (If yes: I can help you restore the data, if you need help.)

Hi! Why did you delete the stream (osm.org/way/368098211/history)? On aerial imagery it is well visible.