@Jojo4u: You’re free to do everything you want with the generated charts as long as you comply with ODbL’s minimal requirement for produced works, i.e. citing OSM as the data source. A link back to this blog article and/or the website taghistory.raifer.tech is very much appreciated, though. :)

Funny idea, that could indeed partially improve the issue with split ways. Still, a proper solution would have to track the actual length and/or area of the respective objects.

Oh, I wasn’t aware of trolleway’s implementation. Thanks for pointing it out!

Now, you can click on the map to get the actual values and a preview of the respective tile:

Math1985 has more interesting examples on his osm diary page: osm.org/user/Math1985/diary/39404

Thanks for your good work! I’m really looking forward to having the lane editor in iD - it’s going to be awesome B-)

Isn’t this exactly the same diary entry as the one you posted already 4 days ago?

I suppose there are better ways to fetch a GPX file from a OSM way

You could also use overpass turbo (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cZY) to load the way and export it as GPX from there.

Nel passato è stato proposto di usare un sistema come http://wiki.hsr.ch/StefanKeller/ReMAPTCHA su osm, ma non è mai stato implementato…

Ah, I see. The city-area definitions are really quite different: https://gist.github.com/tyrasd/8a6b92618eaa2e1a02aa

How did you define the bbox of a city? Because using the Overpass API, I would get significantly smaller numbers of objects (e.g. 18k for Essen or 31k in Dortmund: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/blX). The numbers are even smaller when using exact city limits (e.g. 12k for Dortmund: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/blW or 18k for Yokohama).

In the meantime, the PR has been merged already.

There appears to be a small typo in the MapCSS code above. To display the text for all features (not just nodes) there must be an additional comma between way and relation: {{style: node, way, relation { text: fixme } }} should do the trick.

max1e, sure, I’ll send you a personal message!

max1e, yes, you should be able to install and run sed also on Windows (ask google). This visualization is done only for nodes because the raw data analysis was done (by Frederik Ramm, username: woodpeck) only for nodes. If you want also ways, you’d have to repeat the analysis step, which could be a quite extensive task, I suppose…

Yes, but you can just pan a couple of hundred meters to the South (or in any other direction) and you have the same situation again: Dozens of version 1, imported buildings in low quality, version 1, imported landuse polygons. This is what I’m seeing basically anywhere else in rural France.

Einen Nachteil haben die FIXMEs aber schon: Man kann darüber nicht diskutieren. Bei komplexeren Problemen ist das aber oft sehr nützlich.

@jotzt: no, I’m afraid, that’s not yet implemented.

We should also add this to the editor-imagery-index, I guess…

Spam?