La linea 3 è ufficialmente già in costruzione. Alcuni cantieri sono già stati transennati.
La linea 2 è ancora in fase di progetto.
Ma, attenzione, come già detto, il percorso della linea 3, almeno nella zona Voltabarozzo, è approssimativo.

Ciao Diegomodulo,
quale è la fonte per il percorso del nuovo tram per Voltabarozzo? Manca nel changeset. Inoltre non mi Il percorso non mi sembra giusto almeno nella zona del Ponte di Voltabarozzo

How come that you see a mini-roundabout here?
(I removed it)

Ciao. Vedo che citi OpenTopoMap come fonte. OTM, essendo solo un'altra visualuzzazione degli stessi dati OpenStreetMap non è una fonte valida.

I don't think the tag railway=yard is correct. This building is an ex-railway station, but not an active rail yard (stazione merci). From what I know, discussions are under way to re-enable it as a train stop for some local trains.

Con questo changeset hai messo lock=no e intermittent=yes su alcune waterway a Battaglia Terme. Mi sembra un errore.

Hi. With this changeset you changed the cycleway and footway tagging of Via Padova (way 4042612) from the actual situation of lanes painted on the carriageway to separate ways ("cycleway=track" and "sidewalk=both"). In addition you removed the oneway-for-bicycle information. Please revert the tagging to the situation of 26/04/2022. Thank you. Volker, Padova.

If you feel you can do this, I am happy to do on-the-ground checks for you on request. Also, I presume you have seen that Mapillary coverage is good here.

As I said, the ZTL in Padova is not correctly mapped. I do not consider myself sufficiently knowledgable in the field of complex access restrictions. What I know is that the roads that you have mentioned, are off-limits to me by car, as I am not a permit holder. What is not clear to me, is which additional restrictions apply for permit holders once they are inside the ZTL. I fear that you will not be able to resolve the problem that the local mappers have not solved. Normal routing engines should not allow a car driver to get into the ZTL, most of the time. In addition there are different ZTL zones with different access restrictions and different time tables.

Hi, you re-added access=permissive to via Rudena. This is not correct. This is part of the ZTL, which limits access to permit holders at certain times. Please do not confound "permissive" with "access requires a permit". More in general: mapping of the ZTL in Padova is broken, and needs fixing.

Thanks for bringing this up. To start with my original 2014 tagging of the two concrete blocks/planters was wrong. The tag should have been applied to a node on the way at the position of the planters with max_width=2.3, and not on two blocks besides the road with width=2.3. It looks as if the the blockage at that position is related to the fact that there a two objects about 2.6 meters apart on both side of the way, each with a width of 2.3 meters. I also not that cars are not routed through that block, but bicycles are. I propose to put to place a single barrier=block with max_width=2.3 on the road way. I suspect this will achieve the intended effect on car and bicycle routing.

Come detto, penso che sia meglio di spezzare la relazione in poligoni più piccoli. Non so a che cosa serve una relazione che contiene un solo mega landuse=residential per la città.

Ciao, it's not a question of rendering, it's a question of data. A large hospital is not a residential land use. Farm land is definitely not residential land. The present rendering approach is a trick by the authors of the renderers to make the map rendering work. My main issue with that specific large landuse=residential polygon is that it is simply to big to handle. If you want to work on it, I would suggest to split it in smaller areas and using mainly major roads and waterways as splits.
I simply don't have the time to do this well. I may also have aggravated the problem by changing some land uses. In particular I recently added a missing bit of the Azienda Ospedaliera (western part) that was missing.
Volker

Regarding "BTW": Thanks - that is a finger trouble error, no new tagging practice. Corrected - will be uploaded when I close my active changeset.

There are no traffic signals on the pedestrian crossing in question, and, anyway, if they were, "direction" in that case is meaningless as you cannot distinguish between traffic signal direction for the cars crossing across the pedestrian crossing the footway, and that of pedestrians crossing the road. I will correct the two crossings in question, as I know them as a frequent user.

I checked the name against signs and the official geo-database of house numbers and names. It should be OK now. The bridge itself is called just "Ponte Ognissanti", The road on the eastern side is "Via Fistomba". The road on the western side is "Via Ponte Ognissanti" up to the roundabout. Further west it is called "Via Ognissanti"

OK. Corrected from road signs and direct local knowledge.

node node/179008735/
What do you intend by "direction=both" on a pedestrian crossing?

What is the ource of the name change of the road Via Ognissanti (way 334655693) ?

Corected (no reply from original author)