voschix's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
119599235 | over 3 years ago | Hi.
|
119622935 | over 3 years ago | Scusami. Sbagliato io. |
119622935 | over 3 years ago | Hi. What is the source for the proposed roads?
|
115997055 | over 3 years ago | Bing satellite images do not show the new roundabout (way 1020092411). What is the source of the information? |
56214711 | over 3 years ago | the speed limit change nodes 5401089924 and 269146017 ar both not in the correct positions and also use an "unconventional" tagging scheme. I corrected the speed limit tagging in this area adding speed limits to the road ways and also adding city limit signs. |
51137907 | over 3 years ago | The new roundabout (way 515825490) and related roads need geometry correction. Which data did you use for this modification? |
119256019 | over 3 years ago | typing error corrected |
112276758 | over 3 years ago | Please do not insert roads from imagery when you cannot check accessibility from other sources. Some of the roads you inserted with this changeset are are strictly customers-only. At least add a "fixme" tag stating that you are unsure baout access. |
69455215 | over 3 years ago | Please do not insert roads from imagery when you cannot check accessibility from other sources. Some of the roads you inserted are inside a big fire-brigade compound and strictly off-limits for the general public. At least add a "fixme" tag stating that you are unsure baout access. |
116727021 | over 3 years ago | Thanks - fixed! |
116031010 | over 3 years ago | This is probably due to the fact that I put a street address on a node on the building polygon, which is correct in Italy where house numbers are assigned to entrances, but also the corresponding business (in this case a bank) that uses that house number exclusively in that building. I think the iD error message is not correct. |
115959786 | over 3 years ago | Corrected - thanks! |
90607546 | over 3 years ago | Thank you - corrected! |
81906457 | almost 4 years ago | Potresti aggiungere dettagli alla nuova ciclabile: ciclabile o ciclopedonale condivisa o ciclopedonale con separazione? Senso unico per bici si/no? Superficie? Larghezza? E' completa o ci sono ancor pezzi in costruzione? Grazie |
39954601 | almost 4 years ago | Are you sure that way 424314422 is a power=cable (underground). I suspect this is in reality a power=line (on power poles) |
91874983 | almost 4 years ago | Ho trovato alcuni nodi "tuoi" con traffic_sign=yes ma senza nessun altra informazione (lungo Strada Triangolo). Lavoro incompiuto, suppongo. |
55243239 | almost 4 years ago | What is the source for the gas pipelines? |
71472533 | about 4 years ago | Ciao. Ho rimesso tutto il tratto in dettaglio in OSM. Ho aggiunto attraversamenti mancanti. Ho tenuto conto dei due brevi casi dove la parte ciclabile e la parte pedonale non sono contigui (uno era la quello che avevi identificato sule foto satellitari). Ho utilizzato le foto Mapillary che coprivano tutto il percorso in questione. L'unica incertezza è che ho fato il percorso nell'estate del 2016 - quindi ci possono mancare successive modifiche. |
71472533 | about 4 years ago | Dalle foto Mapillary direi che si trata di una ciclopedonale con corsie separate (highway=path; foot=designate; bicycle=designated; segregated=yes).
|
71472533 | about 4 years ago | Ciao, vedo per caso che hai tolto la parte pedonale della ciclopedonale
|