OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
18241849 about 3 years ago

Ciao Giuseppe, in questo changeset hai inserito un edificio con building:level=1. Dovrebbe essere buildng:levels=1
Ci sono altri tuoi edit con lo stesso errore.
Volker

57640588 over 3 years ago

Hi, you inserted several "permissive" footways on the grounds and aslo some indoors. But the museum charges an entrance fee, so access=customers plus fee=yes seems to describe this better. What is the source for the geometry of the indoors footways?
Greetings from Padova, Volker

119599235 over 3 years ago

Hi.
What is the source for the proposed roads?
Volker (Padova)

119622935 over 3 years ago

Scusami. Sbagliato io.

119622935 over 3 years ago

Hi. What is the source for the proposed roads?
Volker (Padova)

115997055 over 3 years ago

Bing satellite images do not show the new roundabout (way 1020092411). What is the source of the information?

56214711 over 3 years ago

the speed limit change nodes 5401089924 and 269146017 ar both not in the correct positions and also use an "unconventional" tagging scheme. I corrected the speed limit tagging in this area adding speed limits to the road ways and also adding city limit signs.

51137907 over 3 years ago

The new roundabout (way 515825490) and related roads need geometry correction. Which data did you use for this modification?

119256019 over 3 years ago

typing error corrected

112276758 over 3 years ago

Please do not insert roads from imagery when you cannot check accessibility from other sources. Some of the roads you inserted with this changeset are are strictly customers-only. At least add a "fixme" tag stating that you are unsure baout access.

69455215 over 3 years ago

Please do not insert roads from imagery when you cannot check accessibility from other sources. Some of the roads you inserted are inside a big fire-brigade compound and strictly off-limits for the general public. At least add a "fixme" tag stating that you are unsure baout access.

116727021 over 3 years ago

Thanks - fixed!

116031010 over 3 years ago

This is probably due to the fact that I put a street address on a node on the building polygon, which is correct in Italy where house numbers are assigned to entrances, but also the corresponding business (in this case a bank) that uses that house number exclusively in that building. I think the iD error message is not correct.

115959786 over 3 years ago

Corrected - thanks!

90607546 over 3 years ago

Thank you - corrected!

81906457 almost 4 years ago

Potresti aggiungere dettagli alla nuova ciclabile: ciclabile o ciclopedonale condivisa o ciclopedonale con separazione? Senso unico per bici si/no? Superficie? Larghezza? E' completa o ci sono ancor pezzi in costruzione? Grazie

39954601 almost 4 years ago

Are you sure that way 424314422 is a power=cable (underground). I suspect this is in reality a power=line (on power poles)

91874983 almost 4 years ago

Ho trovato alcuni nodi "tuoi" con traffic_sign=yes ma senza nessun altra informazione (lungo Strada Triangolo). Lavoro incompiuto, suppongo.

55243239 about 4 years ago

What is the source for the gas pipelines?

71472533 about 4 years ago

Ciao. Ho rimesso tutto il tratto in dettaglio in OSM. Ho aggiunto attraversamenti mancanti. Ho tenuto conto dei due brevi casi dove la parte ciclabile e la parte pedonale non sono contigui (uno era la quello che avevi identificato sule foto satellitari). Ho utilizzato le foto Mapillary che coprivano tutto il percorso in questione. L'unica incertezza è che ho fato il percorso nell'estate del 2016 - quindi ci possono mancare successive modifiche.