wardmuylaert's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
159332612 | 9 months ago | Hey, you probably want the neighbourhood area to end at the edge of their parcel, not the middle of the road which they do not own. |
159072862 | 9 months ago | Hello, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions. Some of the "pointy" building outlines you have mapped probably are inaccurate. Particularly something like osm.org/way/1333361615 where the sticking out triangle you mapped is just the roof seen at an angle. Admittedly, there is some guesswork involved with that at times. If you are particularly interested in mapping buildings, you can also have a look at rapideditor.org. There is an AI based building outlines and a Chester county building dataset that needs human validation (you can accept a building and still make it match the actual outline manually if it seems off). |
158393351 | 9 months ago | Hello Kocher, welcome to Openstreetmap. You seem to have tagged Devon Drive as having 35 mph speed limit, this seems to be incorrect across its entire stretch. What did you base this on? It also does not have two lanes everywhere. |
157671275 | 9 months ago | Hello Megan, thank you for your contribution. Could you add some more detail to future changeset comments? As far as I can tell you broke up the red loop relation here and it is not clear from the changeset whether that is what you intended to do. |
148837733 | over 1 year ago | I have reverted this edit in change 148859132. The name removal was done just to remove these ways from a data consumer (citystrides.com). ID editor shows the usual upgrade tags suggestion on the ways to readd the name. Data consumer should instead adjust their processing pipeline, in this case to filter out amenity=weighbridge from their dataset. |
131308746 | over 1 year ago | Emailtje erover sturen naar het gemeentebestuur? Ik woon wel niet in deze gemeente, dus op mij zullen ze misschien niet meteen letten. |
131308746 | over 1 year ago | Weet je toevallig nog of dit deel van voetweg 45 ook privé is / niet toegankelijk is? Ik zie (op de OSM kaart) dat de rest access=no is en dat deze weg ook voorbij een gate lijkt te liggen (al heeft de gate raar genoeg enkel access informatie over fietsers en voetgangers, niet auto's). |
121515949 | over 1 year ago | Kan het dat je hier te veel straat hebt verwijderd? Is heel de straat naar de overweg ook weg? Aerial toont dat deel wel nog en zo niet, dan is dat stukje "De Breukeleer" niet meer geconnecteerd met andere straten. |
138816580 | about 2 years ago | Apologies, I'll be sure to keep that in mind going forward. |
138816580 | about 2 years ago | Does the bbox size matter? |
138816580 | about 2 years ago | Hello, it was just a few incorrect key values where people had typoed and forgotten an "s". |
137752752 | about 2 years ago | Hey, I only updated small ways to be consistent with the rest of their streets, those buildings were already violating. (Not that I disagree with you, just that I did not cause it this time :P) |
124741278 | over 2 years ago | Hey, basically the way to do it is by cutting up the Bartlett Lane way into pieces. You can do so in iD editor by right clicking the node where you want to split the way and choosing "split". I did it for you for Bartlett Lane. Thanks for the contribution! |
91732513 | over 2 years ago | Is this bike path a mapping mistake? It starts from some driveway and goes nowhere. osm.org/way/853043021 |
123131794 | over 2 years ago | Perhaps add this background as a note to the way for any other mappers that stumble upon it in the future. |
123131794 | over 2 years ago | I would keep the current setup then, "Marie Rochele" is the official name. Keeping the double "l" spelling as alt_name seems sufficient. |
124386955 | over 2 years ago | Duplicated SRT accordingly just now. |
124386955 | over 2 years ago | Hey, apologies for any trouble that caused. I had made a similar change at the time to the SRT (osm.org/relation/1541998). I am currently abroad and haven't set up jOSM on this laptop yet, so I cannot fix the SRT in the same manner myself. Could you fix it too? If not, I can probably do it later this week or next week. |
126300529 | over 2 years ago | I didn't end up trying to find the French marker as I visited the spot while on a run. It was a bit too chilly (and I have no extra clothes or anything) to also risk falling into one of the the little streams or puddles in the area. :P The BE and LU ones were indeed easy to get to though, thanks for the initial info! |
128235874 | almost 3 years ago | Hmm, it seems when trying to hide the OSM data in ID editor (option-w on a macos keyboard), that node must have still been focused. Macos has some weird useless characters behind its option-letters. I'll fix both, my bad |