CloCkWeRX's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
52997127 | almost 8 years ago | With this one, we can maybe add two points (Yangoora, the Restaurant; and Anderson Hill, the Winery) - what do you think? |
48456822 | almost 8 years ago | You might be interested in improveosm.org, which has a lot of GPS traces for roads - you've managed to get to a few of them, but plenty more in the area :) |
51989970 | almost 8 years ago | I'm going to revert this, as it has marked a whole town as an amenity=toilet |
49382077 | almost 8 years ago | It's probably better to model a number of these as residential road or minor/unclassified road; with surface unpaved |
52319831 | almost 8 years ago | I've tagged this as au:R2-20 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia) |
48837029 | almost 8 years ago | osm.org/node/4865716957 and many of the others on this way seem to be duplicated nodes now
|
52135309 | almost 8 years ago | It's better to trace the individual building outline, not the entire block of land. I'm going to wager that it would be very difficult to or even impossible to confirm this via survey as a web design office, I tend to prefer to leave this kind of detail off the map |
51924861 | almost 8 years ago | It seems like this should definitely be reverted; some of those appear to be useful internal POI. |
51924320 | almost 8 years ago | Landuse=residential is more appropriate, I've fixed this now |
46798498 | almost 8 years ago | No problems; I must have accidentally been looking at digitalglobe premium/mapbox/bing only; though thought I checked the other layers. |
48933069 | almost 8 years ago | No probs, it was just a quick survey on my part from a moving taxi; plus referring to LPI imagery after. If you've looked at it more recently happy to roll with that. |
46798498 | almost 8 years ago | Hi, Way 428124147 looks very different to the available imagery from all providers; are you sure its correct? If so, is it from survey or another source? |
51735532 | almost 8 years ago | Hi!
You've done the land around the house, which isn't necessarily wrong - but you might want to tag these as 'residential landuse' or similar. Keep up the tracing! |
51735204 | almost 8 years ago | Hi, welcome to openstreetmap. Avoid adding information that can't be verified on the ground by survey, such as events ("X happened here", "Bought Y from here"). |
51735432 | almost 8 years ago | Oops, that might not have even been you adding the names on houses, my bad! |
51735432 | almost 8 years ago | Hi!
|
51326647 | almost 8 years ago | Maybe its confused with Southbank Zone Substation; which is nearby? |
51267379 | almost 8 years ago | Might be best to tag the overall relation as a cycleway/cycle route; so it shows up on https://www.opencyclemap.org/ better |
50877988 | almost 8 years ago | I've cleaned up a few of these - thanks for the effort, and welcome to OSM! You might be interested in using the 'square' tool in ID to make neater outsides, you can access it via right clicking or using 'S' as a shortcut key. As others have said, if you type 'House' into the search box on the upper left, you'll get the right tags for a Building (rather than the name) |
50732936 | about 8 years ago | Hi! You might be interested in improve-osm.org or the JOSM plugins for it to find unmapped roads in this area |