CloCkWeRX's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
39701720 | over 8 years ago | Strava will (eventually) update, though it may take a number on months |
44677015 | over 8 years ago | With these, it's probably better to tag them as 'sidewalk'. https://www.mapbox.com/blog/mapping-sidewalks/ talks about it a bit in detail |
44780775 | over 8 years ago | I've tweaked how these are modelled - leisure=pitch and sport=tennis for example are a bit better. Welcome to openstreetmap :) |
44103987 | over 8 years ago | Ah nice work, I don't get up there to survey often enough |
44128921 | over 8 years ago | Nice work! I should probably expand the coverage of Glenelg down south till it meets up with your work |
28320164 | over 8 years ago | I don't see much GPS activity for osm.org/way/323574984 ; do you know if its accurate? Do you have any more information on the construction? |
35522157 | over 8 years ago | Its a bit hard to make sense of osm.org/way/247800173 - improve-osm suggests one set of GPS traces, strava heatmap another; neither are quite how its traced at the moment. http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Mapbox&id=w247800173&map=17.06/174.05481/-41.60812 http://improveosm.org/#background=Bing&map=13.34/-41.6027/174.0730 Could you take another look and see what's the most accurate? |
22788688 | over 8 years ago | I updated a few roads like osm.org/way/286706063 which seemed to have completed construction - do you know if the speed limit of 15km/h is still valid? Did you want to trace the other nearby areas just to the north as well? |
42305900 | over 8 years ago | Do you know if the road works have started or similar? There's no GPS traces via http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&id=w194715172&map=18.38/-0.55229/51.90851 yet, so I'm assuming its very early days |
37787713 | over 8 years ago | http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&map=17.64/-0.65949/51.99354 shows a bit of a different story with osm.org/way/46910762 - are you able to take a look with your knowledge of things on the ground and decide if that bridleway is right; or the gps trace a bit over from it ? |
30490468 | over 8 years ago | Hey, just wanted to say nice work with the house mapping around here! We use mapbox streets at work as a property industry company - http://imgur.com/a/CpPTU is what it looks like in our system. The stuff on the left, blurred, are recent sales along Danks street, which includes things like Land Area from private suppliers. What we don't have (but could get because of your contributions) is approximate building area. One thing you might be interested in asking your local council about is if they have "building footprint data" - check out the City of Geelong, where they flew around and did LIDAR measurements. If they have it and publish it via data.gov.au; importing isn't too tricky. |
43433614 | almost 9 years ago | Keep it up with the building mapping :) |
22647040 | almost 9 years ago | Track can be a good compromise in that case. |
43044791 | almost 9 years ago | http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&map=18.15/-0.11229/50.98508 shows a bit better layout of some of the roads which you might be interested in |
41675069 | almost 9 years ago | I think this might have misaligned osm.org/node/1684996913 |
22647040 | almost 9 years ago | Do you happen to know the surface of osm.org/way/243064597 ? From a strava user note: there is a route but it is not a official road more like a farm track and unsuitable for road bikes |
32910775 | almost 9 years ago | Is this cycleway better modelled as part of the footpath, with bicycle=yes? http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&id=w362607270&map=19.54/-0.97000/37.59444 |
25744404 | almost 9 years ago | Do you know if the bridge (see osm.org/note/771693) is actually there still? |
42722923 | almost 9 years ago | Do you know if osm.org/way/60703903 is a private road at all? A strava user reports: "Camino privado cerrado" |
36233507 | almost 9 years ago | Ah, thanks for adding Herron Todd White :) We're more of a valuation company though! |