This changeset was reverted in osm.org/changeset/117620492

Duplicating road object with the second on top of it is not a good idea. I think you've meant to split the road and set private status to the part of it.
I've investigated and fixed those issues, as well as some others already present on the map. Please check that this is what you've wanted to achieve and whether it now corresponds to reality better

The road part after the gate was already marked as private. Why does road object get transformed to barrier?

Hallo! Ich bin gestern hier osm.org/way/47918582 durchgegangen und habe nichts bemerkt. War die Sperrung deutlich zu sehen?

Опять же - это не дорога на парковке. Также эта дорога не находится над зданием (layer=1), а здание было неправильно расположено. Все мои замечания были исправлены
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112177198

Пересечения дорог следует отмечать общей точкой (iD предлагает это исправление). Тэг service=parking_aisle используется только для проездов между рядов парковки, в остальном можно просто оставить как service road
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112177112

Road osm.org/way/367876712 does not have connection with Malu iela - see recent aerial and streetlevel imagery. New footpaths are redundant because they already are tagged as sidewalks in according road objects.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108204139

source + aerial imagery and local knowledge

Laipni lūdzam OSM!/Добро пожаловать в OSM!
Vai var paskaidrot, kas šeit bija cerēts izdarīt?

*русских

О, я недавно тут правил и не смог официальное название на латышском найти, поэтому не менял. Только почему в латышском названии есть упоминание поморской общины, а в русской нет?

Hello, it seems like this business has been recently closed, is that right?

Many thanks for helping me add new features in Daugavpils!

I see that you are using Maxar imagery, likely without an offset. Unfortunately, this imagery is a bit misaligned, about (1, 3.5)m in Daugavpils. I'm using Esri imagery (almost the same as Latvia - Ortophoto in JOSM) without an offset. Esri also aligns good against Mapillary imagery, which is available in most parts of the city.
It is, however, a bit out-of-date, Maxar is better in this case (some features of recent years are visible only there, not on Esri) and in the case of drawing building contours.

These changes were made using StreetComplete app. It does not provide options for manual changeset splits. Instead, it opens a changeset for each quest (question) type and collects all answers there for some time period (surveying).
So in this case better advice could be not to complete quests from different parts of the world in one session. Only after some time (several hours?) the changeset is closed and uploaded. Answering questions somewhere else would then create a new changeset without greatly expanding bounding box of the previous one.

Дороги, использующиеся для проезда на территории следует отмечать тэгом highway=service. highway=track используется для небольших сельскохозяйственных дорог/неофициальных грунтовок.
Аналогичный вопрос по поводу удалённой дороги, как и в другой правке.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98138997

Почему были удалены дороги, которые видны на аэрофотоснимках и на снимках с земли (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/W6aA9uXanAH8eBVjSgkggE, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ocCaqldH-D75CN6JNMj12A)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98139046

Vai runa iet par veloceļiņu relation tipa objektiem?

Kāpēc tiek dzēsti papildinājumi no manis un Aldis Smans - osm.org/#map=19/55.89631/26.60834, osm.org/#map=19/55.86962/26.51262 (ceļiņi parka ieejā, parka ceļiņa tracing), osm.org/#map=19/55.86727/26.51391 (dzēstas kāpnes, ceļiņu tracing)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94937581

Salabots ar osm.org/changeset/95070919

Uhm, this is rendering not as I've planned. Maybe splitting the forest is the better option...