What spurce did you use?

What source did you use?

What source did you use?

Is it a memorial or is more of an information board?

What source did you use for this info?

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

osm.org/changeset/160927165

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

osm.org/changeset/160926691

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

osm.org/changeset/160926567

Hello. You got rid of the building? That doesn't seem right.

What jhaluska80 said. It's very frowned upon to snap/connect landuse/landcover to roads. makes it a PITA to update.

Looks like some railway tags were left on an orchard relation line:

osm.org/way/479388316

Changeset reverted. We use access=private to denote a road as private.

osm.org/changeset/160661976

When adding business names, do not describe what they make in the name. Unless of course, it is their official name.

I know, old changeset. But I'm just noticed it. :)

Good golf edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160327226

Don't add tennis courts as buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160327993

"Lollipopping" has been fixed. Use multi-polygon relations.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160329662

Do not add tennis courts as buildings. This is not just a whiteboard for your golfing game. This is a real map we use.

Please don't lollipop ways. If something has a "hole" in it, then a multipolygon relation should be used.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160330097

Welcome to OSM. Good edit.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160508471

Good edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160500704