Good edit
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160520801

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote whether they are public or not. I can clearly see the roads from aerial imagery, so they should be mapped.

osm.org/changeset/160620247

Changeset reviewed. Good edit. Square buildings, good alignment to aerial imagery. Keep up the awesome work.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160320507

looks good
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160325062

Don't add it to the building. It should have just been added as a node within the building, especially since there are multiple businesses here.

Hello.

What source did you use for the road name(s)?

bad changeset!

Changeset reviewed as requested. Good edit.

It should appear there automatically after a few days or weeks. We don't manage Facebook or Instagram directly so I can't provide a precise answer unfortunately.

This changeset has been reverted.

Deletion is not the solution. Someone else will inevitably come back and add it, having no recollection or awareness that it was removed, think it was missing and readd it, without the proper access=private. This would indicate it is public.

You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

We can't control what Amazon does, especially their rogue Flex drivers. OSM is only responsible for mapping what is on the ground. Even if the road were removed, there will still be a confused delivery driver or lost tourist who makes the wrong turn, none of which we control, especially if they refer to aerial imagery and not the map itself.

osm.org/changeset/160352853

The name for the condo should not describe what is happening. A name is only a name and should not include "(condos under construction)"

Don't use the name to describe what it is. A name is only a name. "Closure" is descriptive and not the actual name.

Again, I ask, can you leave better changeset comments? What did you change? Why?

What does "Apex" mean?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159746105

Minor tag corrections made
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159721503

Minor corrections made
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159736139

Minor corrections made
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159734566

Hello, and welcome to OSM. We don't use abbreviations. NW should be spelt out to presumably NorthWest?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159747414

Welcome. Good edit. All the tags are correctly applied.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159756413

Just curious, do you recall what source you used for railway crossing numbers/references/IDs?

What is "Apex" What does it mean in the context of what you did?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159724141

This would be a really good addition to OpenHistoricalMap, which is where historical features that no longer exist can be mapped and live on forever. Also a really cool place where you can tag start/end dates and watch the expansion and slowdown of rail in the US.

https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/